From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E1F5DF16; Sat, 3 Feb 2024 14:21:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706970097; cv=none; b=lgraUIGHSJ6gurGX/ncI8EBNq82cSl5YPSSLmptXJtCssRRQ9ABgX6AD2lJLZREQou9sGEyKTAsrjBboCkS1CpxXx/uSqQQEQEkw55ofgEoO4/F/A+f6KxV6JvfXhlJ+sEqs5E0qIsuAGQ2qBRg8dlCO3HDiu9E/P6OL28z2AeY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706970097; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jbe1RCokte3s+lwYFj+Qw2J1gC36MNGy/9NJXF7DZPs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tX1vnHbl5BVkJmVDSsegJiBJ3UKmnmGrhFxq9R3KNHmP3TUhToRJySFg/ZGSjbo9wenIqE5haXcnPWc+iKtLbNq9HDMs7Ig3zZJn/qM3CLx12BdFGC131ar0IAleMixmy02nd1Iij2XUw0qoXJx993X/b/5zbs1tmAmiz3rkjdg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=AfpCzIPj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="AfpCzIPj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1706970096; x=1738506096; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=jbe1RCokte3s+lwYFj+Qw2J1gC36MNGy/9NJXF7DZPs=; b=AfpCzIPjOhlcfh1BTZm8txynmklamMqvWCwYNMCqSEtI8G24YLq/s90P f2d7HxmuIETQJo6YjpfqgjZEewAAYDMWJM72S3DWmzz0May0JStw+7Dej YHgD1AQ9AkK9Xz50kw5IgAV2/Rb1lqKmDVRbtlkmZgzR8/VCUzksDifW4 MwoxV3Vlnq462JgG9Ec+cBQiZI1AvbXGsesuU+vQHZYeBPwFPJ+7IVRug JVReaO6mPcGECHTOxhgxjlHfksqYHBgkJYxn5SIeEsEWj5jZ/Jbp0+A3n B/b+zTLJsWVeLUlXQF5JGkDZGnHZqFYLulUFRmD7qfvydaUK4cUSF1DJO Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10973"; a="11680506" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,240,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="11680506" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2024 06:21:35 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,240,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="540616" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 59f4f4cd5935) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2024 06:21:32 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 59f4f4cd5935 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rWGtd-00059M-28; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 14:21:29 +0000 Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 22:20:51 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Fiona Klute , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Ping-Ke Shih Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Kalle Valo , Ulf Hansson , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek , =?utf-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej?= Jirman , Fiona Klute Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] wifi: rtw88: Shared module for rtw8723x devices Message-ID: <202402032222.kwUrsH9V-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240202121050.977223-2-fiona.klute@gmx.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240202121050.977223-2-fiona.klute@gmx.de> Hi Fiona, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on wireless-next/main] [also build test WARNING on wireless/main linus/master v6.8-rc2 next-20240202] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Fiona-Klute/wifi-rtw88-Shared-module-for-rtw8723x-devices/20240202-201428 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wireless/wireless-next.git main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202121050.977223-2-fiona.klute%40gmx.de patch subject: [PATCH 1/9] wifi: rtw88: Shared module for rtw8723x devices config: x86_64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240203/202402032222.kwUrsH9V-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240203/202402032222.kwUrsH9V-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402032222.kwUrsH9V-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723x.c:156:6: warning: no previous prototype for function '__rtw8723x_cfg_ldo25' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 156 | void __rtw8723x_cfg_ldo25(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool enable) | ^ drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723x.c:156:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 156 | void __rtw8723x_cfg_ldo25(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool enable) | ^ | static 1 warning generated. vim +/__rtw8723x_cfg_ldo25 +156 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723x.c 155 > 156 void __rtw8723x_cfg_ldo25(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool enable) 157 { 158 u8 ldo_pwr; 159 160 ldo_pwr = rtw_read8(rtwdev, REG_LDO_EFUSE_CTRL + 3); 161 if (enable) { 162 ldo_pwr &= ~BIT_MASK_LDO25_VOLTAGE; 163 ldo_pwr |= (BIT_LDO25_VOLTAGE_V25 << 4) | BIT_LDO25_EN; 164 } else { 165 ldo_pwr &= ~BIT_LDO25_EN; 166 } 167 rtw_write8(rtwdev, REG_LDO_EFUSE_CTRL + 3, ldo_pwr); 168 } 169 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki