From: Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@samsung.com>
To: adrian.hunter@intel.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] mmc: sdhci: Prevent stale command and data interrupt handling
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 18:10:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241003161007.3485810-1-m.wilczynski@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CGME20241003161012eucas1p2ab704a8771869e142b024cc95d5ecb5d@eucas1p2.samsung.com
While working with the T-Head 1520 LicheePi4A SoC, certain conditions
arose that allowed me to reproduce a race issue in the sdhci code.
To reproduce the bug, you need to enable the sdio1 controller in the
device tree file
`arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520-lichee-module-4a.dtsi` as follows:
&sdio1 {
bus-width = <4>;
max-frequency = <100000000>;
no-sd;
no-mmc;
broken-cd;
cap-sd-highspeed;
post-power-on-delay-ms = <50>;
status = "okay";
wakeup-source;
keep-power-in-suspend;
};
When resetting the SoC using the reset button, the following messages
appear in the dmesg log:
[ 8.164898] mmc2: Got command interrupt 0x00000001 even though no
command operation was in progress.
[ 8.174054] mmc2: sdhci: ============ SDHCI REGISTER DUMP ===========
[ 8.180503] mmc2: sdhci: Sys addr: 0x00000000 | Version: 0x00000005
[ 8.186950] mmc2: sdhci: Blk size: 0x00000000 | Blk cnt: 0x00000000
[ 8.193395] mmc2: sdhci: Argument: 0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000000
[ 8.199841] mmc2: sdhci: Present: 0x03da0000 | Host ctl: 0x00000000
[ 8.206287] mmc2: sdhci: Power: 0x0000000f | Blk gap: 0x00000000
[ 8.212733] mmc2: sdhci: Wake-up: 0x00000000 | Clock: 0x0000decf
[ 8.219178] mmc2: sdhci: Timeout: 0x00000000 | Int stat: 0x00000000
[ 8.225622] mmc2: sdhci: Int enab: 0x00ff1003 | Sig enab: 0x00ff1003
[ 8.232068] mmc2: sdhci: ACmd stat: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000
[ 8.238513] mmc2: sdhci: Caps: 0x3f69c881 | Caps_1: 0x08008177
[ 8.244959] mmc2: sdhci: Cmd: 0x00000502 | Max curr: 0x00191919
[ 8.254115] mmc2: sdhci: Resp[0]: 0x00001009 | Resp[1]: 0x00000000
[ 8.260561] mmc2: sdhci: Resp[2]: 0x00000000 | Resp[3]: 0x00000000
[ 8.267005] mmc2: sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00001000
[ 8.271453] mmc2: sdhci: ADMA Err: 0x00000000 | ADMA Ptr:
0x0000000000000000
[ 8.278594] mmc2: sdhci: ============================================
I also enabled some traces to better understand the problem:
kworker/3:1-62 [003] ..... 8.163538: mmc_request_start:
mmc2: start struct mmc_request[000000000d30cc0c]: cmd_opcode=5
cmd_arg=0x0 cmd_flags=0x2e1 cmd_retries=0 stop_opcode=0 stop_arg=0x0
stop_flags=0x0 stop_retries=0 sbc_opcode=0 sbc_arg=0x0 sbc_flags=0x0
sbc_retires=0 blocks=0 block_size=0 blk_addr=0 data_flags=0x0 tag=0
can_retune=0 doing_retune=0 retune_now=0 need_retune=0 hold_retune=1
retune_period=0
<idle>-0 [000] d.h2. 8.164816: sdhci_cmd_irq:
hw_name=ffe70a0000.mmc quirks=0x2008008 quirks2=0x8 intmask=0x10000
intmask_p=0x18000
irq/24-mmc2-96 [000] ..... 8.164840: sdhci_thread_irq:
msg=
irq/24-mmc2-96 [000] d.h2. 8.164896: sdhci_cmd_irq:
hw_name=ffe70a0000.mmc quirks=0x2008008 quirks2=0x8 intmask=0x1
intmask_p=0x1
irq/24-mmc2-96 [000] ..... 8.285142: mmc_request_done:
mmc2: end struct mmc_request[000000000d30cc0c]: cmd_opcode=5
cmd_err=-110 cmd_resp=0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 cmd_retries=0 stop_opcode=0
stop_err=0 stop_resp=0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 stop_retries=0 sbc_opcode=0
sbc_err=0 sbc_resp=0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 sbc_retries=0 bytes_xfered=0
data_err=0 tag=0 can_retune=0 doing_retune=0 retune_now=0 need_retune=0
hold_retune=1 retune_period=0
Here's what happens: the __mmc_start_request function is called with
opcode 5. Since the power to the Wi-Fi card, which resides on this SDIO
bus, is initially off after the reset, an interrupt SDHCI_INT_TIMEOUT is
triggered. Immediately after that, a second interrupt SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE
is triggered. Depending on the exact timing, these conditions can
trigger the following race problem:
1) The sdhci_cmd_irq top half handles the command as an error. It sets
host->cmd to NULL and host->pending_reset to true.
2) The sdhci_thread_irq bottom half is scheduled next and executes faster
than the second interrupt handler for SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE. It clears
host->pending_reset before the SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE handler runs.
3) The pending interrupt SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE handler gets called, triggering
a code path that prints: "mmc2: Got command interrupt 0x00000001 even
though no command operation was in progress."
To solve this issue, we need to clear pending interrupts when resetting
host->pending_reset. This ensures that after sdhci_threaded_irq restores
interrupts, there are no pending stale interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@samsung.com>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 4b91c9e96635..b91a6076c332 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -3098,6 +3098,10 @@ static bool sdhci_request_done(struct sdhci_host *host)
sdhci_reset_for(host, REQUEST_ERROR);
host->pending_reset = false;
+
+ /* Clear any pending interrupts after reset */
+ sdhci_writel(host, SDHCI_INT_CMD_MASK | SDHCI_INT_DATA_MASK,
+ SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
}
/*
--
2.34.1
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20241003161012eucas1p2ab704a8771869e142b024cc95d5ecb5d@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2024-10-03 16:10 ` Michal Wilczynski [this message]
2024-10-07 16:09 ` [PATCH v1] mmc: sdhci: Prevent stale command and data interrupt handling Adrian Hunter
2024-10-07 17:00 ` Michal Wilczynski
2024-10-07 18:58 ` Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241003161007.3485810-1-m.wilczynski@samsung.com \
--to=m.wilczynski@samsung.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox