public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: haibo.chen@nxp.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	haibo.chen@nxp.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, s32@nxp.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: save tuning value for the SDIO card as wakeup source
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:08:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202410150906.OEI0jyKN-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241014060130.1162629-4-haibo.chen@nxp.com>

Hi,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on shawnguo/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.12-rc3 next-20241014]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/haibo-chen-nxp-com/mmc-sdhci-export-APIs-for-sdhci-irq-wakeup/20241014-140300
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014060130.1162629-4-haibo.chen%40nxp.com
patch subject: [PATCH 3/4] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: save tuning value for the SDIO card as wakeup source
config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241015/202410150906.OEI0jyKN-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241015/202410150906.OEI0jyKN-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410150906.OEI0jyKN-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c:1592:13: warning: 'sdhc_esdhc_tuning_restore' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
    1592 | static void sdhc_esdhc_tuning_restore(struct sdhci_host *host)
         |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c:1569:13: warning: 'sdhc_esdhc_tuning_save' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
    1569 | static void sdhc_esdhc_tuning_save(struct sdhci_host *host)
         |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +/sdhc_esdhc_tuning_restore +1592 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c

  1568	
> 1569	static void sdhc_esdhc_tuning_save(struct sdhci_host *host)
  1570	{
  1571		struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
  1572		struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
  1573		u32 reg;
  1574	
  1575		/*
  1576		 * SD/eMMC do not need this tuning save because it will re-init
  1577		 * after system resume back.
  1578		 * Here save the tuning delay value for SDIO device since it may
  1579		 * keep power during system PM. And for usdhc, only SDR50 and
  1580		 * SDR104 mode for SDIO devide need to do tuning, and need to
  1581		 * save/restore.
  1582		 */
  1583		if ((host->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR50) |
  1584				(host->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104)) {
  1585			reg = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS);
  1586			reg = (reg & ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS_TAP_SEL_PRE_MASK) >>
  1587					ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS_TAP_SEL_PRE_SHIFT;
  1588			imx_data->boarddata.saved_tuning_delay_cell = reg;
  1589		}
  1590	}
  1591	
> 1592	static void sdhc_esdhc_tuning_restore(struct sdhci_host *host)
  1593	{
  1594		struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
  1595		struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
  1596		u32 reg;
  1597	
  1598		if ((host->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR50) |
  1599				(host->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104)) {
  1600			/*
  1601			 * restore the tuning delay value actually is a
  1602			 * manual tuning method, so clear the standard
  1603			 * tuning enable bit here. Will set back this
  1604			 * ESDHC_STD_TUNING_EN in esdhc_reset_tuning()
  1605			 * when trigger re-tuning.
  1606			 */
  1607			reg = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);
  1608			reg &= ~ESDHC_STD_TUNING_EN;
  1609			writel(reg, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);
  1610	
  1611			reg = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
  1612			reg |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL | ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
  1613			writel(reg, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
  1614	
  1615			writel(imx_data->boarddata.saved_tuning_delay_cell <<
  1616					ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS_DLY_CELL_SET_PRE_SHIFT,
  1617					host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS);
  1618		}
  1619	}
  1620	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-15  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-14  6:01 [PATCH 0/4] refactor the system PM logic for sdhci-esdhc-imx haibo.chen
2024-10-14  6:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] mmc: sdhci: export APIs for sdhci irq wakeup haibo.chen
2024-10-14  6:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: refactor the system PM logic haibo.chen
2024-10-17 13:07   ` Ulf Hansson
2024-10-18  1:22     ` Bough Chen
2024-10-18  3:20       ` Bough Chen
2024-10-22  8:28         ` Ulf Hansson
2024-11-07  9:20           ` Bough Chen
2024-11-15 11:16             ` Ulf Hansson
2024-10-14  6:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: save tuning value for the SDIO card as wakeup source haibo.chen
2024-10-15  2:08   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-10-14  6:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: do not change to sleep pinctrl state in suspend if enable wakeup haibo.chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202410150906.OEI0jyKN-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=s32@nxp.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox