From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BC162580D6; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739204710; cv=none; b=NL40TZb/79xdiFfirYAyXZN6lBEYj4yQg47xhEMPnuQmHf97hcFVyK7hTgaCByVVbnc4vm3dsjbnHDEJXNF90KoSushR4sJh1O5GZl7hDHCk2USanyzD85r+dm2BJKMG4VW4qeotiz+OI8LXgR1y9LRz/KOwWFhXirZw/A7Rv10= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739204710; c=relaxed/simple; bh=J1vqTI0fG2ICMpAX1Wcx+LsnGdWVzwbfDeSxED93siY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=WSOzxl9R5Wif/tj+moegY81lQuxfV6qLvrcv7U3El8vl4DHRhfVE5Tb10c2BkHBy+zrve6fq7z38HXFfzjOYmZnTu+nbAPb5sYyRcEGH1NqEZ0mC9AC6Ch/jtZ9kGQfhq+zXcyKLmp0oj7blcG5tczgOKlFup2f9wVXw3JgSR7g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=RjjBvG1I; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RjjBvG1I" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 324A8C4CED1; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:25:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739204709; bh=J1vqTI0fG2ICMpAX1Wcx+LsnGdWVzwbfDeSxED93siY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RjjBvG1IZ2U2km/x14X8PR2pbtonsPBtFV7ehJYwJsZKDU9A0HwGEpFZzNnSDET7/ ysAxQQMGFU91ZsaxqoESdH1Tlxm32l4DXpkDCRkiyEUMs4d8gPA6cn6p/VRnIJ8ZEk FuxofcV3pksQpMzY2ypnlz0VkSK5+6Ppf9rotw1nKCNIqPdV4MFIh5yXRKPKIK1WfS 45U3KmqBvrsxy4+t8/6vdRcnVYXXh7u4QjoeuFKjtRnGBApLiwqHf8BjFKTU0v6KMa er5GsPMdd3UjQRGNgJ+czYXclEMzAMJr1WP6eRs7vX38CBncHKf2nWNJeb1hqXjPVv xVSpf2HS1Z1qg== Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 08:25:07 -0800 From: Eric Biggers To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , Gaurav Kashyap , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Dmitry Baryshkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/7] Support for hardware-wrapped inline encryption keys Message-ID: <20250210162507.GB1264@sol.localdomain> References: <20250204060041.409950-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250204060041.409950-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> Hi Jens, On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 10:00:34PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > This is targeting 6.15. As per the suggestion from Jens > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/c3407d1c-6c5c-42ee-b446-ccbab1643a62@kernel.dk/), > I'd like patches 1-3 to be queued up into a branch that gets pulled into > the block tree. I'll then take patches 4-7 through the fscrypt tree, > also for 6.15. If I end up with too many merge conflicts by trying to > take patches 5-7 (given that this is a cross-subsystem feature), my > fallback plan will be to wait until 6.16 to land patches 5-7, when they > will finally be unblocked by the block patches having landed. Let me know what you think about this plan. - Eric