From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
To: Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Romain Naour <romain.naour@smile.fr>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Jason Kridner <jkridner@beagleboard.org>,
"Aldea, Andrei" <a-aldea@ti.com>, David <daowens01@gmail.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sdhci-omap: additional PM issue since 5.16
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 18:58:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250309185811.73aa1fc1@akair> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOCHtYj-0KG2oMuyof1c35c=A8PaUfYPZFuLY_YDKmq-SV8h2g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Am Fri, 7 Mar 2025 08:42:02 -0600
schrieb Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 10:28 PM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> >
> > Best to revert the patch first until the issue has been fixed.
> >
> > Based on the symptoms, it sounds like there might be a missing flush of
> > a posted write in the PM runtime suspend/resume path. This could cause
> > something in the sequence happen in the wrong order for some of the
> > related surrounding resources like power, clocks or interrupts.
> >
>
> Kington's hardware anaylizer said after CMD5/sleep in about 10us,
> instead of CMD5/wkup being called, it just resets the eMMC.. So
> someone deep within the sdhc/mmc layer might understand that. ;)
>
hmm, omap3/4/5 are using omap-hsmmc and are not switched towards sdhci
yet. So I guess that might be the reason why things are not coming to
light that easy. Also I am wondering whether we can start by destroying
SD cards rather then eMMC. So maybe we can do some stress-testing to
have the cycles shorter. Do we have an overview what is really working
reliable with that driver?
Regards,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-09 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-23 22:09 sdhci-omap: additional PM issue since 5.16 David Owens
2025-01-24 10:36 ` Romain Naour
2025-01-24 17:15 ` David Owens
2025-01-24 18:49 ` David
2025-01-27 9:06 ` Romain Naour
2025-01-27 21:20 ` Robert Nelson
2025-02-26 15:36 ` Robert Nelson
2025-02-26 16:06 ` Andreas Kemnade
2025-03-07 4:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2025-03-07 14:42 ` Robert Nelson
2025-03-09 17:58 ` Andreas Kemnade [this message]
2025-03-12 11:55 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-03-20 4:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2025-03-20 8:47 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-04-01 4:00 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250309185811.73aa1fc1@akair \
--to=andreas@kemnade.info \
--cc=a-aldea@ti.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=daowens01@gmail.com \
--cc=jkridner@beagleboard.org \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robertcnelson@gmail.com \
--cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=romain.naour@smile.fr \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox