From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBF8E225A32 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741697675; cv=none; b=nmifh1IBekK6+64QAeNLTbwmhjiIYUZzBaaWG7JFlMQWGbFse0FC/LKCpkF+X6V8mM/kwoLHpOKDXV8N9MLfGxK7Z8+oVPa4aMya2n9zxURDLKFsdtRpZUS86/eTxR//sboM6LLCvXqdil/xSIG+/D88SRC4366d3aKe4xJE7AM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741697675; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9sjBBWS9bpI3NZmO5G/TMQPP/DrdJFrc0FcE29rYoS4=; h=From:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Subject; b=C8nwbKtdrL8pSuwrOWG3P5hrWoUKDigi6yd/U1bh/i9LNcOKsZQL0k+9j6lMrfvodRr4RYZpQk+HQmTMlAg+U/llVbi0lJ1ViJIQwl9i5o2FxHTfHwxSj3KliTMKT2Z6Rvak1OlFhcJI3JWCVLrkpwtk7whBTY4SmizCU4iaT14= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Kfk4hlLl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Kfk4hlLl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E57DC4CEE9; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:54:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741697674; bh=9sjBBWS9bpI3NZmO5G/TMQPP/DrdJFrc0FcE29rYoS4=; h=From:Date:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=Kfk4hlLl/DU2omwOZI51ydtKR6OX1M1i+jAmjWx44K3DFm0JITGELXYNpHrXmh/Ne GLrC/BsvNW8m1+mt6SORSS2HNe1gjLG4eolBQbYTtrgDjhSrboDwTRtr/O5q0scst2 5U0+H+KTMk+6maXYh4ienHr8j3shPYY/4RfItejSR25Gvupko5JzAC3dA1EkpMQkSg 23eqrJ3PkoClV/DuI+6nZJUUX9A+lnkpzRMnXrvEc54OiQZAesVQGEuDuul0NRI/29 EGnw1ie+AZwST/e+yd+NL+cFqFXdFUUQNM3WDDzRn5kn92t0U+EcSBB/qHczkqyY0o VT6caqyoUg0SA== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32EB380AC1C; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:55:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Adrian Hunter via Bugspray Bot Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:55:18 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ricky_wu@realtek.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org Message-ID: <20250311-b218821c14-1185eb2dfa30@bugzilla.kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240922-b218821c0-26591b0a1008@bugzilla.kernel.org> References: <20240922-b218821c0-26591b0a1008@bugzilla.kernel.org> Subject: Re: RTS522A fails with "mmc: error -95 doing runtime resume" on Microsoft Surface Go 2 X-Bugzilla-Product: Drivers X-Bugzilla-Component: MMC/SD X-Mailer: bugspray 0.1-dev Adrian Hunter writes via Kernel.org Bugzilla: On 21/02/25 16:55, bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218821 > > --- Comment #13 from Thomas Haschka (haschka@gmail.com) --- > Created attachment 307693 > --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=307693&action=edit > Patch for 6.12.16 which solves the problem on the surface go 2 > > By reversing the bisected commit it was possible to me to build this patch > for > the current 6.12.16 kernel which yields stable sd card operation on the > surface go 2. I do not really see how that commit could affect the card, but it could be that it results in runtime suspend then runtime resume happening very close together. If there were insufficient delays to allow voltage levels to reach the correct values, it could result in the card misbehaving as seen. View: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218821#c14 You can reply to this message to join the discussion. -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. Kernel.org Bugzilla (bugspray 0.1-dev)