[PATCH 06/11] dt-bindings: mmc: rockchip-dw-mshc: Add compatible string for R1103B

[PATCH 06/11] dt-bindings: mmc: rockchip-dw-mshc: Add compatible string for R1103B

[Fabio Estevam]

From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@nabladev.com>

The dw-mshc controller in the RV1103B is compatible to the one first found
in the RK3288 SoC, so add the RV1103B to the variant list.

Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@nabladev.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
index acb9fb9a92cd..a75209bd2710 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ properties:
               - rockchip,rk3562-dw-mshc
               - rockchip,rk3568-dw-mshc
               - rockchip,rk3588-dw-mshc
+              - rockchip,rv1103b-dw-mshc
               - rockchip,rv1108-dw-mshc
               - rockchip,rv1126-dw-mshc
           - const: rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH 06/11] dt-bindings: mmc: rockchip-dw-mshc: Add compatible string for R1103B

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 03:13:04PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@nabladev.com>
> 
> The dw-mshc controller in the RV1103B is compatible to the one first found
> in the RK3288 SoC, so add the RV1103B to the variant list.
> 
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org

Please drop the autogenerated scripts/get_maintainer.pl CC-entries from
commit msg. There is no single need to store automated output of
get_maintainers.pl in the git log. It can be easily re-created at any
given time, thus its presence in the git history is redundant and
obfuscates the log.

If you need it for your own patch management purposes, keep it under the
--- separator.

It's confusing way of new soc bringup. Maintainer receives one patch out
of 11 and what has to do with it? Apply? Ack? Where is it explained?

And before you answer that this is supposed to be applied by Rockchip,
then NO, it was explained many times and is documented in bindings for
years that it goes via MMC.

Best regards,
Krzysztof