From: Nelson Johnson <nzjfr547@gmail.com>
To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: adrian.hunter@intel.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nelson Johnson <nzjfr547@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci-pci: disable aggressive runtime PM for Braswell SD on Lenovo N22
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 16:23:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260316212325.4207-2-nzjfr547@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260316212325.4207-1-nzjfr547@gmail.com>
Lenovo N22 systems with the Braswell SD controller (PCI ID 8086:2296) regress on kernels newer than 4.9. On this machine the SD slot is exposed through both PCI and ACPI firmware nodes, and enabling the newer aggressive runtime PM/card-detect wake path causes the controller to stop behaving like the older working configuration.
Keep the Lenovo N22 on the pre-4.14 behavior by skipping MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM and MMC_CAP_CD_WAKE for the 8086:2296 slot on this DMI match, and disable runtime PM for that host.
This preserves the rest of the Braswell/Atom handling while restoring the power-management behavior that allows the slot to function on the Lenovo N22.
Fixes: 6cf4156c0988 ("mmc: sdhci-pci: Enable card detect wake for Intel BYT-related SD controllers")
Signed-off-by: Nelson Johnson <nzjfr547@gmail.com>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
index 47a0a7388..4b3c61609 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
@@ -923,6 +923,13 @@ static bool jsl_broken_hs400es(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
dmi_match(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR, "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.");
}
+static bool sdhci_pci_is_lenovo_n22_bsw_sd(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
+{
+ return slot->chip->pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_BSW_SD &&
+ dmi_match(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "LENOVO") &&
+ dmi_match(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "N22");
+}
+
static int glk_emmc_probe_slot(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
{
int ret = byt_emmc_probe_slot(slot);
@@ -1120,9 +1127,13 @@ static void byt_needs_pwr_off(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
static int byt_sd_probe_slot(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
{
+ bool runtime_pm_ok = !sdhci_pci_is_lenovo_n22_bsw_sd(slot);
+
byt_probe_slot(slot);
- slot->host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY |
- MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM | MMC_CAP_CD_WAKE;
+ slot->host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY;
+ if (runtime_pm_ok)
+ slot->host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM |
+ MMC_CAP_CD_WAKE;
slot->cd_idx = 0;
slot->cd_override_level = true;
if (slot->chip->pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_BXT_SD ||
@@ -1135,7 +1146,10 @@ static int byt_sd_probe_slot(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
slot->chip->pdev->subsystem_device == PCI_SUBDEVICE_ID_NI_78E3)
slot->host->mmc->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_AVOID_3_3V;
- byt_needs_pwr_off(slot);
+ if (runtime_pm_ok)
+ byt_needs_pwr_off(slot);
+ else
+ slot->chip->allow_runtime_pm = false;
return 0;
}
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-16 21:23 [PATCH 0/3] mmc: Lenovo N22 Braswell SD slot fixes Nelson Johnson
2026-03-16 21:23 ` Nelson Johnson [this message]
2026-03-20 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci-pci: disable aggressive runtime PM for Braswell SD on Lenovo N22 Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-16 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-pci: force polling card detect " Nelson Johnson
2026-03-16 21:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sdhci-acpi: exclude INT33BB:00 from ACPI binding " Nelson Johnson
2026-03-20 18:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-20 13:27 ` [PATCH 0/3] mmc: Lenovo N22 Braswell SD slot fixes Adrian Hunter
2026-03-20 16:47 ` Nelson Johnson
2026-03-20 17:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-20 18:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-20 23:07 ` Nelson Johnson
2026-03-21 11:07 ` Hans de Goede
2026-03-24 15:05 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-03-20 17:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260316212325.4207-2-nzjfr547@gmail.com \
--to=nzjfr547@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox