public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
To: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	<shawn.lin@linux.dev>, "Bin Liu" <b-liu@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: block: use single block write in retry
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:34:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324143448.2631888-3-b-liu@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324143448.2631888-1-b-liu@ti.com>

Due to errata i2493[0], multi-block write would still fail in retries.

With i2493, the MMC interface has the potential of write failures when
issuing multi-block writes operating in HS200 mode with excessive IO
supply noise.

While the errata provides guidance in hardware design and layout to
minimize the IO supply noise, in theory the write failure cannot be
resolved in hardware. The software solution to ensure the data integrity
is to add minimum 5us delay between block writes. Single-block write is
the practical way to introduce the delay.

This patch reuses recovery_mode flag, and switches to single-block
write in retry when multi-block write fails. It covers both CQE and
non-CQE cases.

[0] https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/sprz582
Signed-off-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
---
v2: add errata details in the commit message.

 drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
index 05ee76cb0a08..00016584d70d 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
@@ -1401,6 +1401,9 @@ static void mmc_blk_data_prep(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
 		    rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE &&
 		    (md->flags & MMC_BLK_REL_WR);
 
+	if (req->rq_flags & RQF_XFER_SINGLE_BLK)
+		recovery_mode = 1;
+
 	memset(brq, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_blk_request));
 
 	mmc_crypto_prepare_req(mqrq);
@@ -1540,10 +1543,13 @@ static void mmc_blk_cqe_complete_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
 		err = 0;
 
 	if (err) {
-		if (mqrq->retries++ < MMC_CQE_RETRIES)
+		if (mqrq->retries++ < MMC_CQE_RETRIES) {
+			if (rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE)
+				req->rq_flags |= RQF_XFER_SINGLE_BLK;
 			blk_mq_requeue_request(req, true);
-		else
+		} else {
 			blk_mq_end_request(req, BLK_STS_IOERR);
+		}
 	} else if (mrq->data) {
 		if (blk_update_request(req, BLK_STS_OK, mrq->data->bytes_xfered))
 			blk_mq_requeue_request(req, true);
@@ -2085,6 +2091,8 @@ static void mmc_blk_mq_complete_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
 	} else if (!blk_rq_bytes(req)) {
 		__blk_mq_end_request(req, BLK_STS_IOERR);
 	} else if (mqrq->retries++ < MMC_MAX_RETRIES) {
+		if (rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE)
+			req->rq_flags |= RQF_XFER_SINGLE_BLK;
 		blk_mq_requeue_request(req, true);
 	} else {
 		if (mmc_card_removed(mq->card))
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-24 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-10 16:04 [PATCH] mmc: block: use single block write in retry Bin Liu
2026-03-16 15:01 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-03-16 16:22   ` Bin Liu
2026-03-24 12:44     ` Ulf Hansson
2026-03-17 12:46 ` Shawn Lin
2026-03-17 13:24   ` Bin Liu
2026-03-18  1:43     ` Shawn Lin
2026-03-18 14:55       ` Bin Liu
2026-03-18 15:10         ` Bin Liu
2026-03-18 15:17       ` Bin Liu
2026-03-23 13:05         ` Bin Liu
2026-03-24  7:34           ` Shawn Lin
2026-03-24 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Bin Liu
2026-03-24 14:34   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] block: define new rqf_flags RQF_XFER_SINGLE_BLK Bin Liu
2026-03-24 18:48     ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-24 19:11       ` Bin Liu
2026-03-24 19:16         ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-24 20:41           ` Bin Liu
2026-03-24 14:34   ` Bin Liu [this message]
2026-03-24 14:57   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] mmc: block: use single block write in retry Ulf Hansson
2026-03-24 19:17     ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-25 13:49   ` [PATCH v3] " Bin Liu
2026-03-25 14:12     ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-25 14:21       ` Bin Liu
2026-03-25 14:23         ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-25 14:27           ` Bin Liu
2026-03-25 15:22             ` Ulf Hansson
2026-03-25 15:29               ` Bin Liu
2026-03-26 12:33     ` Ulf Hansson
2026-03-26 13:41       ` Bin Liu
2026-03-27 20:08       ` [PATCH] mmc: block: optimize size of struct mmc_queue_req Bin Liu
2026-03-31 10:35         ` Ulf Hansson
2026-03-31 12:43           ` Bin Liu
2026-04-02 12:31         ` [PATCH c2] " Bin Liu
2026-04-09 15:52           ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260324143448.2631888-3-b-liu@ti.com \
    --to=b-liu@ti.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@linux.dev \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox