From: Artem Shimko <a.shimko.dev@gmail.com>
To: andriy.shevchenko@intel.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
ulfh@kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de
Cc: Artem Shimko <a.shimko.dev@gmail.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: improve delay handling with fsleep()
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 14:00:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260518110034.142587-2-a.shimko.dev@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260518110034.142587-1-a.shimko.dev@gmail.com>
The driver currently uses udelay() for short delays, which performs
busy-waiting and may not be optimal even for very short durations.
While udelay() is appropriate for atomic context, these specific delays
occur in non-atomic contexts where sleeping is allowed.
Replace udelay(1) with fsleep(1) in dwcmshc_rk3568_set_clock() and
rk35xx_sdhci_reset(). The fsleep() function automatically selects the
optimal delay mechanism based on the requested duration - for
delays <= 10 microseconds it will use udelay() internally, but provides
better flexibility for future adjustments and makes the code more
consistent with kernel best practices. No functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: Artem Shimko <a.shimko.dev@gmail.com>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
index 0b2158a7e409..8c3ca47c8060 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ static void dwcmshc_rk3568_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock
/* Reset DLL */
sdhci_writel(host, BIT(1), DWCMSHC_EMMC_DLL_CTRL);
- udelay(1);
+ fsleep(1);
sdhci_writel(host, 0x0, DWCMSHC_EMMC_DLL_CTRL);
/*
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ static void rk35xx_sdhci_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
if (mask & SDHCI_RESET_ALL && priv->reset) {
reset_control_assert(priv->reset);
- udelay(1);
+ fsleep(1);
reset_control_deassert(priv->reset);
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-18 11:00 [PATCH 0/3] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: Minor cleanups Artem Shimko
2026-05-18 11:00 ` Artem Shimko [this message]
2026-05-18 14:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: improve delay handling with fsleep() Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-18 14:50 ` Artem Shimko
2026-05-18 18:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-19 15:43 ` Artem Shimko
2026-05-18 11:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: remove redundant IS_ERR() check Artem Shimko
2026-05-20 6:18 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-05-18 11:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: use dev_err_probe() to simplify error paths Artem Shimko
2026-05-20 6:18 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-05-20 7:14 ` Artem Shimko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260518110034.142587-2-a.shimko.dev@gmail.com \
--to=a.shimko.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox