From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Komal Bajaj <komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulfh@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, monish.chunara@oss.qualcomm.com,
Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Monish Chunara <quic_mchunara@quicinc.com>,
Rakesh Kota <rakesh.kota@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Raviteja Laggyshetty <raviteja.laggyshetty@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Sneh Mankad <sneh.mankad@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Vishnu Santhosh <vishnu.santhosh@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Xueyao An <xueyao.an@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Introduce Shikra SoC base dtsi
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 16:58:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260714215846.GA2932445-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708-shikra-dt-v7-2-977b65a300c1@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 05:47:31PM +0530, Komal Bajaj wrote:
> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm Shikra SoC,
> an IoT-focused platform built around a heterogeneous CPU cluster
> (Cortex-A55 + Cortex-A78C) with RPM-based power and clock management.
>
> Enable support for the following peripherals:
> - CPU nodes
> - Global Clock Controller (GCC)
> - RPM-based clock controller (RPMCC) and power domains (RPMPD)
> - Interrupt controller
> - Top Level Mode Multiplexer (TLMM)
> - Debug UART
> - eMMC host controller
> - System timer and watchdog
>
> Co-developed-by: Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Monish Chunara <quic_mchunara@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Monish Chunara <quic_mchunara@quicinc.com>
> Co-developed-by: Rakesh Kota <rakesh.kota@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Kota <rakesh.kota@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <raviteja.laggyshetty@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <raviteja.laggyshetty@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Sneh Mankad <sneh.mankad@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sneh Mankad <sneh.mankad@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Vishnu Santhosh <vishnu.santhosh@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Santhosh <vishnu.santhosh@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Xueyao An <xueyao.an@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xueyao An <xueyao.an@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com>
So none of these people nor the maintainers managed to run dtbs_check on
this?
All of these show up as undocumented in linux-next now:
'qcom,scm-shikra', 'qcom,scm'
'qcom,shikra-imem', 'mmio-sram'
'qcom,shikra-tcsr', 'syscon'
Please fix or drop this series.
I'm tired of chasing down new QCom DT warnings.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 12:17 [PATCH v7 0/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add initial device tree support for Shikra Komal Bajaj
2026-07-08 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document Shikra and its EVK boards Komal Bajaj
2026-07-08 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Introduce Shikra SoC base dtsi Komal Bajaj
2026-07-14 21:58 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2026-07-08 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add Shikra CQ2390M SoM platform Komal Bajaj
2026-07-08 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add Shikra IQ2390S " Komal Bajaj
2026-07-08 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add Shikra EVK boards Komal Bajaj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260714215846.GA2932445-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imran.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=monish.chunara@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_mchunara@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
--cc=rakesh.kota@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=raviteja.laggyshetty@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sneh.mankad@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
--cc=vishnu.santhosh@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=xueyao.an@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox