Linux MultiMedia Card development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: Promote the th1520 reset handling to ip level
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 15:01:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <25d5ba5f-3f07-411a-a4d2-ae4a06a44a94@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251112001426.17252-1-jszhang@kernel.org>

Hi Jisheng,

在 2025/11/12 星期三 8:14, Jisheng Zhang 写道:
> Commit 27e8fe0da3b7 ("mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: Prevent stale command
> interrupt handling") clears pending interrupts when resetting
> host->pending_reset to ensure no pending stale interrupts after
> sdhci_threaded_irq restores interrupts. But this fix is only added for
> th1520 platforms, in fact per my test, this issue exists on all
> dwcmshc users, such as cv1800b, sg2002, and synaptics platforms.
> 
> So promote the above reset handling from th1520 to ip level.
 > > Fixes: 017199c2849c ("mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: Add support for Sophgo 
CV1800B and SG2002")
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> ---
>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
> index eebd45389956..c17168edc9fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
> @@ -289,6 +289,19 @@ static void dwcmshc_adma_write_desc(struct sdhci_host *host, void **desc,
>   	sdhci_adma_write_desc(host, desc, addr, len, cmd);
>   }
>   
> +static void dwcmshc_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
> +{
> +	sdhci_reset(host, mask);
> +
> +	/* The dwcmshc does not comply with the SDHCI specification
> +	 * regarding the "Software Reset for CMD line should clear 'Command
> +	 * Complete' in the Normal Interrupt Status Register." Clear the bit
> +	 * here to compensate for this quirk.
> +	 */
> +	if (mask & SDHCI_RESET_CMD)
> +		sdhci_writel(host, SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> +}
> +
>   static unsigned int dwcmshc_get_max_clock(struct sdhci_host *host)
>   {
>   	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> @@ -686,7 +699,7 @@ static void rk35xx_sdhci_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
>   		reset_control_deassert(priv->reset);
>   	}
>   
> -	sdhci_reset(host, mask);
> +	dwcmshc_reset(host, mask);

Thanks for the patch. However, I'm afraid it's overkill for the IP used
by Rockchip at least. From the databook v1.70a released by synopsys, it
clearly says:

"The following registers and bits are cleared by this bit:
- Present State register - Command Inhibit (CMD) bit
- Normal Interrupt Status register - Command Complete bit
- Error Interrupt Status - Response error statuses related
to Command Inhibit (CMD) bit "

To be more rigorous, I askeed my IC team performed a simulation this
morning. The results confirmed that the IP's behavior complies with the 
description in the databook.

Is this a problem with an early version of the dwc IP? If so, I think it
should cc all users of this driver to have a check if making it a IP
level change.

>   }
>   
>   static int dwcmshc_rk35xx_init(struct device *dev, struct sdhci_host *host,
> @@ -832,15 +845,7 @@ static void th1520_sdhci_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
>   	struct dwcmshc_priv *priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>   	u16 ctrl_2;
>   
> -	sdhci_reset(host, mask);
> -
> -	/* The T-Head 1520 SoC does not comply with the SDHCI specification
> -	 * regarding the "Software Reset for CMD line should clear 'Command
> -	 * Complete' in the Normal Interrupt Status Register." Clear the bit
> -	 * here to compensate for this quirk.
> -	 */
> -	if (mask & SDHCI_RESET_CMD)
> -		sdhci_writel(host, SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> +	dwcmshc_reset(host, mask);
>   
>   	if (priv->flags & FLAG_IO_FIXED_1V8) {
>   		ctrl_2 = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> @@ -886,7 +891,7 @@ static void cv18xx_sdhci_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
>   	struct dwcmshc_priv *priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>   	u32 val, emmc_caps = MMC_CAP2_NO_SD | MMC_CAP2_NO_SDIO;
>   
> -	sdhci_reset(host, mask);
> +	dwcmshc_reset(host, mask);
>   
>   	if ((host->mmc->caps2 & emmc_caps) == emmc_caps) {
>   		val = sdhci_readl(host, priv->vendor_specific_area1 + CV18XX_SDHCI_MSHC_CTRL);
> @@ -958,7 +963,7 @@ static void cv18xx_sdhci_post_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host)
>   	val |= SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL;
>   	sdhci_writel(host, val, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
>   
> -	sdhci_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_CMD | SDHCI_RESET_DATA);
> +	dwcmshc_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_CMD | SDHCI_RESET_DATA);
>   }
>   
>   static int cv18xx_sdhci_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
> @@ -1080,7 +1085,7 @@ static inline void sg2042_sdhci_phy_init(struct sdhci_host *host)
>   
>   static void sg2042_sdhci_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
>   {
> -	sdhci_reset(host, mask);
> +	dwcmshc_reset(host, mask);
>   
>   	if (mask & SDHCI_RESET_ALL)
>   		sg2042_sdhci_phy_init(host);
> @@ -1100,7 +1105,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_dwcmshc_ops = {
>   	.set_bus_width		= sdhci_set_bus_width,
>   	.set_uhs_signaling	= dwcmshc_set_uhs_signaling,
>   	.get_max_clock		= dwcmshc_get_max_clock,
> -	.reset			= sdhci_reset,
> +	.reset			= dwcmshc_reset,
>   	.adma_write_desc	= dwcmshc_adma_write_desc,
>   	.irq			= dwcmshc_cqe_irq_handler,
>   };
> @@ -1121,7 +1126,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_dwcmshc_bf3_ops = {
>   	.set_bus_width		= sdhci_set_bus_width,
>   	.set_uhs_signaling	= dwcmshc_set_uhs_signaling,
>   	.get_max_clock		= dwcmshc_get_max_clock,
> -	.reset			= sdhci_reset,
> +	.reset			= dwcmshc_reset,
>   	.adma_write_desc	= dwcmshc_adma_write_desc,
>   	.irq			= dwcmshc_cqe_irq_handler,
>   	.hw_reset		= dwcmshc_bf3_hw_reset,


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-12  0:14 [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: Promote the th1520 reset handling to ip level Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-12  7:01 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
2025-11-12 13:11   ` Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-12 14:14     ` Shawn Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=25d5ba5f-3f07-411a-a4d2-ae4a06a44a94@rock-chips.com \
    --to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox