From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] mmc: sdhci: Add 64-bit ADMA support Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:05:50 +0100 Message-ID: <2905300.MGH0Qn3mUo@wuerfel> References: <1413883585-16299-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <5451E802.1010704@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:60322 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758245AbaJ3IGA (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:06:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5451E802.1010704@intel.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Adrian Hunter Cc: Ulf Hansson , Chris Ball , linux-mmc On Thursday 30 October 2014 09:25:54 Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 21/10/14 12:26, Adrian Hunter wrote: > > Hi > > > > Here are patches to add 64-bit ADMA support to the SDHCI driver. > > > > The patchset starts with 3 minor fixes related to SDHCI ADMA, > > then there are 8 preparatory patches, then 3 main patches, then > > the mmc_test "Badly aligned" tests are extended slightly. > > Hi Ulf > > Can you take these? Note that there was a V2 of > "mmc: sdhci-acpi: Add 64-bit DMA support". Also > that patch is dependent (for functionality not > compilation) on a patch in v3.18-rc2 so it is slightly > preferable if you pull v3.18-rc2 first. You still haven't addressed my comments about clearing the SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA flag if the platform finds that hardware has set this bit incorrectly. Arnd