From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@codeaurora.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, georgi.djakov@linaro.org,
asutoshd@codeaurora.org, stummala@codeaurora.org,
venkatg@codeaurora.org, pramod.gurav@linaro.org,
jeremymc@redhat.com, git@kchr.de
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv1 6/8] mmc: sdhci: Clear SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag after platform_execute_tuning
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:07:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3aeac9e4-d707-ffaf-181b-386ef98813ef@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540a0163-f6ea-494d-b90f-f818f8030153@intel.com>
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for reviewing.
On 1/19/2017 3:40 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 10/01/17 09:00, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>> Clear SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag after platform_execute_tuning
>> so that platform_execute_tuning may use it if needed.
>
> Sorry for the slow reply.
>
> platform_execute_tuning() should not really exist because it doesn't do
> anything useful.
>
> If it is not too much trouble please consider just hooking
> ->execute_tuning() directly i.e.
>
> host->mmc_host_ops.execute_tuning = sdhci_msm_execute_tuning;
>
> Then you can use and clear the flag in sdhci_msm_execute_tuning().
Sure, this seems fine. I will try it and re-submit based on your above
suggestion.
Regards
Ritesh
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> index 2390980..2658f89 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> @@ -2114,7 +2114,6 @@ int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>>
>> hs400_tuning = host->flags & SDHCI_HS400_TUNING;
>> - host->flags &= ~SDHCI_HS400_TUNING;
>>
>> if (host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1)
>> tuning_count = host->tuning_count;
>> @@ -2156,7 +2155,9 @@ int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>>
>> if (host->ops->platform_execute_tuning) {
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>> - return host->ops->platform_execute_tuning(host, opcode);
>> + err = host->ops->platform_execute_tuning(host, opcode);
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> }
>>
>> host->mmc->retune_period = tuning_count;
>> @@ -2167,6 +2168,7 @@ int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>>
>> sdhci_end_tuning(host);
>> out_unlock:
>> + host->flags &= ~SDHCI_HS400_TUNING;
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>>
>> return err;
>>
>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-19 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-10 7:00 [RESEND PATCHv1 0/8] mmc: sdhci-msm: Provide support for enhanced strobe Ritesh Harjani
2017-01-10 7:00 ` [RESEND PATCHv1 1/8] mmc: sdhci-msm: Factor out sdhci_msm_hc_select_mode Ritesh Harjani
2017-01-19 10:04 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-01-10 7:00 ` [RESEND PATCHv1 2/8] mmc: sdhci-msm: Factor out function to set/get msm clock rate Ritesh Harjani
2017-01-19 10:04 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-01-10 7:00 ` [RESEND PATCHv1 3/8] mmc: sdhci-msm: Factor out sdhci_msm_hs400 Ritesh Harjani
2017-01-19 10:04 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-01-10 7:00 ` [RESEND PATCHv1 4/8] mmc: sdhci-msm: Reset vendor specific func register on probe Ritesh Harjani
2017-01-19 10:05 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-01-10 7:00 ` [RESEND PATCHv1 5/8] mmc: sdhci-msm: configure CORE_CSR_CDC_DELAY_CFG to recommended value Ritesh Harjani
2017-01-19 10:05 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-01-20 17:42 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-01-24 8:59 ` Ritesh Harjani
2017-01-10 7:00 ` [RESEND PATCHv1 6/8] mmc: sdhci: Clear SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag after platform_execute_tuning Ritesh Harjani
2017-01-19 10:10 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-01-19 11:37 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2017-01-10 7:00 ` [RESEND PATCHv1 7/8] mmc: sdhci-msm: Make HS400 tuning follow as per recommeneded HW sequence Ritesh Harjani
2017-01-19 10:15 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-01-10 7:00 ` [RESEND PATCHv1 8/8] mmc: sdhci-msm: Provide enhanced_strobe mode feature support Ritesh Harjani
2017-01-19 10:21 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-01-17 1:07 ` [RESEND PATCHv1 0/8] mmc: sdhci-msm: Provide support for enhanced strobe Jeremy McNicoll
2017-01-18 7:54 ` Ritesh Harjani
2017-01-19 20:53 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-01-20 5:18 ` Ritesh Harjani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3aeac9e4-d707-ffaf-181b-386ef98813ef@codeaurora.org \
--to=riteshh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
--cc=git@kchr.de \
--cc=jeremymc@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pramod.gurav@linaro.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=venkatg@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox