From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Shyam Sundar S K <ssundark@amd.com>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "Sen,
Pankaj" <Pankaj.Sen@amd.com>,
"Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com>,
"Agrawal, Nitesh-kumar" <Nitesh-kumar.Agrawal@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-pci-core: Tuning mode support for HS200 on AMD Platforms
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:55:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <418f99e4-18e5-38a6-0b4d-0815f3bd604f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ef1e2da-5913-85fe-65a7-0984ac04164d@amd.com>
On 04/10/16 11:42, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> This patch adds support for HS200 tuning mode on AMD eMMC-4.5.1
>
> Reviewed-by: Sen, Pankaj <Pankaj.Sen@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: S-k, Shyam-sundar <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 182 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 180 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
> index 897cfd2..5893ec4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
> @@ -734,6 +734,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_pci_fixes sdhci_via = {
> .probe = via_probe,
> };
>
> +
Unnecessary blank line
> static int rtsx_probe_slot(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
> {
> slot->host->mmc->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_HS200;
> @@ -755,6 +756,172 @@ enum amd_chipset_gen {
> AMD_CHIPSET_UNKNOWN,
> };
>
> +struct tuning_descriptor {
It would be nicer to prefix all structure and function names by something
specific to the device e.g. amd_...
> + unsigned char tune_around;
> + bool this_tune_ok;
> + bool last_tune_ok;
> + bool valid_front_end;
> + unsigned char valid_front;
> + unsigned char valid_window_max;
> + unsigned char tune_low_max;
> + unsigned char tune_low;
> + unsigned char valid_window;
> + unsigned char tune_result;
'unsigned char' -> 'u8'
> +};
> +
> +static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_pci_ops;
> +static struct tuning_descriptor tdescriptor;
tdescriptor should not be global. You need somewhere to put private
data. How about this:
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:04:45 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-pci: Let devices define their own private data
Let devices define their own private data to facilitate device-specific
operations. The size of the private structure is specified in the
sdhci_pci_fixes structure, then sdhci_pci_probe_slot() will allocate extra
space for it, and sdhci_pci_priv() can be used to get a reference to it.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 3 ++-
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
index 1d9e00a00e9f..782c8d25c0c8 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
@@ -1646,6 +1646,7 @@ static struct sdhci_pci_slot *sdhci_pci_probe_slot(
struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot;
struct sdhci_host *host;
int ret, bar = first_bar + slotno;
+ size_t priv_size = chip->fixes ? chip->fixes->priv_size : 0;
if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, bar) & IORESOURCE_MEM)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "BAR %d is not iomem. Aborting.\n", bar);
@@ -1667,7 +1668,7 @@ static struct sdhci_pci_slot *sdhci_pci_probe_slot(
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
}
- host = sdhci_alloc_host(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct sdhci_pci_slot));
+ host = sdhci_alloc_host(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*slot) + priv_size);
if (IS_ERR(host)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot allocate host\n");
return ERR_CAST(host);
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h
index 6bccf56bc5ff..6a1be6afe089 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct sdhci_pci_fixes {
int (*resume) (struct sdhci_pci_chip *);
const struct sdhci_ops *ops;
+ size_t priv_size;
};
struct sdhci_pci_slot {
@@ -87,6 +88,8 @@ struct sdhci_pci_slot {
struct mmc_card *card,
unsigned int max_dtr, int host_drv,
int card_drv, int *drv_type);
+
+ unsigned long private[0] ____cacheline_aligned;
};
struct sdhci_pci_chip {
@@ -101,4 +104,9 @@ struct sdhci_pci_chip {
struct sdhci_pci_slot *slots[MAX_SLOTS]; /* Pointers to host slots */
};
+static inline void *sdhci_pci_priv(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
+{
+ return (void *)slot->private;
+}
+
#endif /* __SDHCI_PCI_H */
--
1.9.1
> +
> +static int tuning_reset(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> + unsigned int val;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> +
> + val = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> + val |= SDHCI_CTRL_PRESET_VAL_ENABLE | SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
> + sdhci_writew(host, val, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> +
> + val = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> + val &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
> + sdhci_writew(host, val, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int config_tuning_phase(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned char phase)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = slot->chip->pdev;
> + unsigned int val;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> +
> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, 0xb8, &val);
> + val &= ~0x1f;
> + val |= (0x10800 | (phase << 1));
> + pci_write_config_dword(pdev, 0xb8, val);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int find_good_phase(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> + struct tuning_descriptor *td = &tdescriptor;
> + struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = slot->chip->pdev;
> + unsigned int val;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (td->this_tune_ok == false)
> + td->valid_front_end = 1;
> +
> + if (td->valid_front_end)
> + td->valid_front = td->valid_front;
Assigning 'td->valid_front' to itself?
> + else if (td->this_tune_ok)
> + td->valid_front = td->valid_front + 1;
Use '+= 1'
> +
> + if ((!td->this_tune_ok && td->last_tune_ok) ||
> + (td->tune_around == 11)) {
> +
> + if (td->valid_window > td->valid_window_max) {
> + td->valid_window_max = td->valid_window;
> + td->tune_low_max = td->tune_low;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (td->this_tune_ok && (!td->last_tune_ok))
> + td->tune_low = td->tune_around;
> + if (!td->this_tune_ok && td->last_tune_ok)
> + td->valid_window = 0x0;
Just use 0 not 0x0.
> + else if (td->this_tune_ok)
> + td->valid_window = td->valid_window + 1;
Use '+= 1'
> +
> + td->last_tune_ok = td->this_tune_ok;
> +
> + if (td->tune_around == 11) {
> + if ((td->valid_front + td->valid_window) >
> + td->valid_window_max) {
> + if (td->valid_front > td->valid_window)
> + td->tune_result = ((td->valid_front -
> + td->valid_window) >> 1);
> + else
> + td->tune_result = td->tune_low +
> + ((td->valid_window + td->valid_front) >> 1);
> + } else {
> + td->tune_result = td->tune_low_max +
> + (td->valid_window_max>>1);
> + }
> +
> +
> + if (td->tune_result > 0x0b)
> + td->tune_result = 0x0b;
> +
> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, 0xb8, &val);
> + val &= ~0x1f;
> + val |= (0x10800 | (td->tune_result<<1));
> + pci_write_config_dword(pdev, 0xb8, val);
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
> +{
> + struct tuning_descriptor *td = &tdescriptor;
> + u8 ctrl;
> +
> + tuning_reset(host);
> + memset(td, 0x0, sizeof(struct tuning_descriptor));
> +
> + if (host->quirks2 & SDHCI_QUIRK2_CLEAR_TRANSFERMODE_REG_BEFORE_CMD)
> + opcode = MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200;
Why change the opcode?
> +
> + for (td->tune_around = 0; td->tune_around < 12; td->tune_around++) {
> +
> + config_tuning_phase(host, td->tune_around);
> +
> + if (mmc_send_tuning(host->mmc, opcode, NULL)) {
> + td->this_tune_ok = false;
> + host->mmc->need_retune = 0;
> + mdelay(4);
> + ctrl = SDHCI_RESET_CMD | SDHCI_RESET_DATA;
> + sdhci_writeb(host, ctrl, SDHCI_SOFTWARE_RESET);
> + } else {
> + td->this_tune_ok = true;
> + }
> +
> + find_good_phase(host);
It looks like tune_around is a temporary that should be passed as a parameter
to find_good_phase()
> + }
> +
> + host->mmc->retune_period = 0;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_enable_manual_tuning(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = slot->chip->pdev;
> + unsigned int val;
> +
> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, 0xd0, &val);
> + val &= 0xffffffcf;
> + val |= 0x30;
> + pci_write_config_dword(pdev, 0xd0, val);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int amd_probe(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
> {
> struct pci_dev *smbus_dev;
> @@ -779,14 +946,25 @@ static int amd_probe(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
>
> if ((gen == AMD_CHIPSET_BEFORE_ML) || (gen == AMD_CHIPSET_CZ)) {
> chip->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_CLEAR_TRANSFERMODE_REG_BEFORE_CMD;
> - chip->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_HS200;
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int amd_probe_slot(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_host *host = slot->host;
> +
> + if (host->quirks2 & SDHCI_QUIRK2_CLEAR_TRANSFERMODE_REG_BEFORE_CMD) {
Please don't use a quirk to identify the chip.
> + sdhci_pci_ops.platform_execute_tuning = amd_execute_tuning;
You can't do that because sdhci_pci_ops is shared with every PCI SDHCI host
controller not just AMD.
Have a look at:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&m=147565902811041&w=2
and re-base on top of that series.
> + amd_enable_manual_tuning(slot);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct sdhci_pci_fixes sdhci_amd = {
> .probe = amd_probe,
> + .probe_slot = amd_probe_slot,
> };
>
> static const struct pci_device_id pci_ids[] = {
> @@ -1397,7 +1575,7 @@ static int sdhci_pci_select_drive_strength(struct sdhci_host *host,
> card_drv, drv_type);
> }
>
> -static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_pci_ops = {
> +static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_pci_ops = {
> .set_clock = sdhci_set_clock,
> .enable_dma = sdhci_pci_enable_dma,
> .set_bus_width = sdhci_pci_set_bus_width,
>
Please run checkpatch --strict and consider it suggestions.
Please consider adding some explanation of the tuning algorithm
and defining some of the constants.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-10 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-04 8:42 [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-pci-core: Tuning mode support for HS200 on AMD Platforms Shyam Sundar S K
2016-10-10 7:55 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2016-10-27 9:52 ` Shyam Sundar S K
2016-11-07 12:00 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-11-08 9:45 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-11-09 6:18 ` Shyam Sundar S K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=418f99e4-18e5-38a6-0b4d-0815f3bd604f@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com \
--cc=Nitesh-kumar.Agrawal@amd.com \
--cc=Pankaj.Sen@amd.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ssundark@amd.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox