David Vrabel wrote:
> 
> It's harmless if the tuple contains fewer so I think we should just try
> and parse as many strings as possible.  Does this patch fix your regression?

I spelt the field name wrong in the comment.  Use this patch instead,
please.

David
-- 
David Vrabel, Senior Software Engineer, Drivers
CSR, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park,  Tel: +44 (0)1223 692562
Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ                 http://www.csr.com/


Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom