From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Cameron Subject: Re: [patch 077/232] sdio: fix read buffer overflow Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:11:37 +0100 Message-ID: <4AC4B899.9000701@cam.ac.uk> References: <200909222345.n8MNj9kq013725@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <4AC47F84.20806@cam.ac.uk> <4AC48E8E.6030808@csr.com> <4AC48FA1.409@csr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.137]:51337 "EHLO ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932542AbZJAOfI (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:35:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4AC48FA1.409@csr.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: David Vrabel Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, roel.kluin@gmail.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org" David Vrabel wrote: > David Vrabel wrote: >> It's harmless if the tuple contains fewer so I think we should just try >> and parse as many strings as possible. Does this patch fix your regression? > > I spelt the field name wrong in the comment. Use this patch instead, > please. Works for me, so Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron I guess it's just a question of posting it as a normal patch and seeing if anyone screams. Thanks, Jonathan