From: Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
To: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sdhci : reduce irq off latency
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:57:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C1B26CD.5070405@parrot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinZ8If_JswEhoOShRZbQSjlh1uKgFYasnsfFeRx@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1355 bytes --]
Hi,
Thanks you for the test.
here a new version of the patch. It doesn't replace mdelay with jiffies
anymore. It changes mdelay to udelay (the granularity of 1 ms becomes 10
us).
I didn't mesure irq off latency with this patch.
Matthieu
Kyungmin Park a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Not good news. This patch make a hang at probe time.
> it's tested against commit 7e27d6e778cd87b6f2415515d7127eba53fe5d02
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Date: Fri Jun 11 19:14:04 2010 -0700
>
> Linux 2.6.35-rc3
>
> Thank you,
> Kyungmin Park
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Matthieu CASTET
> <matthieu.castet@parrot.com> wrote:
>> sdhci code got tasklets (sdhci_tasklet_card and sdhci_tasklet_finish),
>> that does :
>> {
>> spin_lock_irqsave
>>
>> if (cond) {
>> sdhci_reset
>> sdhci_reset
>> }
>>
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore
>> }
>>
>> sdhci_reset {
>> ...
>> while (read_reg) {
>> if (timeout == 0)
>> break;
>> timeout--;
>> mdelay(1);
>> }
>> ...
>> }
>>
>>
>> The problem is that sdhci_reset [1] does busy pooling (with a granularity of
>> 1 ms) on a register up to a timeout of 100 ms.
>>
>> With the current code, we got irq off during 2*1ms. With the attached patch
>> we reduce irq off to 30 us.
>>
>> Note that worst case 100 ms irq off still exist.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
>>
>>
[-- Attachment #2: sdhci.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1617 bytes --]
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index c6d1bd8..fa06c70 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static void sdhci_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
host->clock = 0;
/* Wait max 100 ms */
- timeout = 100;
+ timeout = 100*100;
/* hw clears the bit when it's done */
while (sdhci_readb(host, SDHCI_SOFTWARE_RESET) & mask) {
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static void sdhci_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
return;
}
timeout--;
- mdelay(1);
+ udelay(10);
}
if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_RESTORE_IRQS_AFTER_RESET)
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ static void sdhci_send_command(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
WARN_ON(host->cmd);
/* Wait max 10 ms */
- timeout = 10;
+ timeout = 10*100;
mask = SDHCI_CMD_INHIBIT;
if ((cmd->data != NULL) || (cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_BUSY))
@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static void sdhci_send_command(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
return;
}
timeout--;
- mdelay(1);
+ udelay(10);
}
mod_timer(&host->timer, jiffies + 10 * HZ);
@@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static void sdhci_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
sdhci_writew(host, clk, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
/* Wait max 20 ms */
- timeout = 20;
+ timeout = 20*100;
while (!((clk = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL))
& SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_STABLE)) {
if (timeout == 0) {
@@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ static void sdhci_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
return;
}
timeout--;
- mdelay(1);
+ udelay(10);
}
clk |= SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-18 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-17 9:07 sdhci : reduce irq off latency Matthieu CASTET
2010-06-18 0:16 ` Kyungmin Park
2010-06-18 7:57 ` Matthieu CASTET [this message]
2010-06-18 8:26 ` Kyungmin Park
2010-08-28 2:23 ` Chris Ball
2010-08-30 9:40 ` Matthieu CASTET
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C1B26CD.5070405@parrot.com \
--to=matthieu.castet@parrot.com \
--cc=kmpark@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).