linux-mmc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
To: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sdhci : reduce irq off latency
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:57:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C1B26CD.5070405@parrot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinZ8If_JswEhoOShRZbQSjlh1uKgFYasnsfFeRx@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1355 bytes --]

Hi,

Thanks you for the test.

here a new version of the patch. It doesn't replace mdelay with jiffies 
anymore. It changes mdelay to udelay (the granularity of 1 ms becomes 10 
us).
I didn't mesure irq off latency with this patch.

Matthieu


Kyungmin Park a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> Not good news. This patch make a hang at probe time.
> it's tested against commit 7e27d6e778cd87b6f2415515d7127eba53fe5d02
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Date:   Fri Jun 11 19:14:04 2010 -0700
> 
>     Linux 2.6.35-rc3
> 
> Thank you,
> Kyungmin Park
> 
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Matthieu CASTET
> <matthieu.castet@parrot.com> wrote:
>> sdhci code got tasklets (sdhci_tasklet_card and sdhci_tasklet_finish),
>> that does :
>> {
>> spin_lock_irqsave
>>
>> if (cond) {
>> sdhci_reset
>> sdhci_reset
>> }
>>
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore
>> }
>>
>> sdhci_reset {
>> ...
>> while (read_reg) {
>> if (timeout == 0)
>>   break;
>> timeout--;
>> mdelay(1);
>> }
>> ...
>> }
>>
>>
>> The problem is that sdhci_reset [1] does busy pooling (with a granularity of
>> 1 ms) on a register up to a timeout of 100 ms.
>>
>> With the current code, we got irq off during 2*1ms. With the attached patch
>> we reduce irq off to 30 us.
>>
>> Note that worst case 100 ms irq off still exist.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
>>
>>

[-- Attachment #2: sdhci.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1617 bytes --]

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index c6d1bd8..fa06c70 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static void sdhci_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
 		host->clock = 0;
 
 	/* Wait max 100 ms */
-	timeout = 100;
+	timeout = 100*100;
 
 	/* hw clears the bit when it's done */
 	while (sdhci_readb(host, SDHCI_SOFTWARE_RESET) & mask) {
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static void sdhci_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
 			return;
 		}
 		timeout--;
-		mdelay(1);
+		udelay(10);
 	}
 
 	if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_RESTORE_IRQS_AFTER_RESET)
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ static void sdhci_send_command(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
 	WARN_ON(host->cmd);
 
 	/* Wait max 10 ms */
-	timeout = 10;
+	timeout = 10*100;
 
 	mask = SDHCI_CMD_INHIBIT;
 	if ((cmd->data != NULL) || (cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_BUSY))
@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static void sdhci_send_command(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
 			return;
 		}
 		timeout--;
-		mdelay(1);
+		udelay(10);
 	}
 
 	mod_timer(&host->timer, jiffies + 10 * HZ);
@@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static void sdhci_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
 	sdhci_writew(host, clk, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
 
 	/* Wait max 20 ms */
-	timeout = 20;
+	timeout = 20*100;
 	while (!((clk = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL))
 		& SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_STABLE)) {
 		if (timeout == 0) {
@@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ static void sdhci_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
 			return;
 		}
 		timeout--;
-		mdelay(1);
+		udelay(10);
 	}
 
 	clk |= SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN;

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-18  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-17  9:07 sdhci : reduce irq off latency Matthieu CASTET
2010-06-18  0:16 ` Kyungmin Park
2010-06-18  7:57   ` Matthieu CASTET [this message]
2010-06-18  8:26     ` Kyungmin Park
2010-08-28  2:23 ` Chris Ball
2010-08-30  9:40   ` Matthieu CASTET

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C1B26CD.5070405@parrot.com \
    --to=matthieu.castet@parrot.com \
    --cc=kmpark@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).