From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Cousson, Benoit" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] omap3/omap4 hsmmc: Register offset handling Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:50:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4C811960.9060801@ti.com> References: <23570.10.24.255.18.1283190527.squirrel@dbdmail.itg.ti.com> <4C80A76F.3060108@ti.com> <87eida4ysh.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:48609 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752925Ab0ICPvO (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:51:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87eida4ysh.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: kishore kadiyala , "Kadiyala, Kishore" , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "tony@atomide.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan" , "adrian.hunter@nokia.com" On 9/3/2010 5:44 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > kishore kadiyala writes: > >> Hi Benoit >> >> >> >>>> + while (!(omap_readl(base + reg_off)& >>>> MMCHS_SYSSTATUS_RESETDONE)) >>>> cpu_relax(); >>> >>> Why does that series not seems to be based on your hwmod migration? The >>> reset is fully handle by the hwmod framework now. >> >> Agree. But Kevin has suggested to post this patch independent of hwmod. >> Does this patch has to go in hwmod series ? > > I suggested that this register conversion patch could be merged before > the hwmod conversion as it is independent of that. OK, I missed that part. I was surprised because the hwmod series was sent before that one. Benoit