From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peppe CAVALLARO Subject: Re: [PATCH (mmc-next) 1/3] mmc: add suspend/resume in the sdhci-pltfm driver (V3) Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 07:36:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA967F8.9030005@st.com> References: <1285663289-20283-1-git-send-email-peppe.cavallaro@st.com> <20100930232526.GA29636@void.printf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from eu1sys200aog108.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.125]:40059 "EHLO eu1sys200aog108.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752017Ab0JDFhY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2010 01:37:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100930232526.GA29636@void.printf.net> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Ball Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "w.sang@pengutronix.de" Hi Chris. On 10/01/2010 01:25 AM, Chris Ball wrote: > Looks like we're waiting for a version of your STM driver with final > changes from Wolfram's review -- do you think you'll submit that soon? Concerning the stm driver I've a doubt: currently on our platforms I can use both the sdhci-stm and sdhci-pltfm drivers. The former is not strictly necessary at this moment because the sdhci-pltfm works fine. In the near future I'll have to start using SDIO and eMMC devices. I wonder if I'll be able to continue to use the platform driver or if I'll need to actually have own driver (to solve specific limits/features .... due to our Hw) or if we'll extend the sdhci-pltfm d.d. What do you think? In any case, no problem to rework and send the sdhci-stm driver again. Peppe > - Chris. > -- > Chris Ball > One Laptop Per Child >