From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
To: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: agressive clocking framework v9
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 10:23:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD7C195.9000805@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43E4817426ED174AA81263BCECB4351D131D9D41BC@sc-vexch3.marvell.com>
Philip Rakity wrote:
> One case that I do not see handled is support of hardware clock gating.
> SD 3.0 has this as well as our v2.0 controller.
> a) add a quirk that the driver can set to indicate h/w support for clock gating is available
Right now there is a Kconfig option, that compiles out all of the
software clock gating. This sounds more like we shouldn't do
it that way: instead always compile it in and then use a new
host flag to indicate whether to activate it or not.
Is this what you mean?
> b) add a new field to ios that indicates if hardware clock gating to be enabled / disabled
> c) clock gating is set to disabled until final speed negotiation during card detection after which it may be enabled.
This seems like orthogonal, but realated stuff that can be
added on top.
> d) keep sdio clock gating OFF -- need this from our experience.
This was added already in the v8 variant of this patchset, for
the SW-controlled gating.
> I can try to add this to your patch if you like or perhaps you
> can do this in the next submission
OK, seems like a good idea.
I can't test it with your hardware anyway.
But base your work on the v8 patch, this v9 using runtime PM is
not going to work. v10 will move back to the v8 approach.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-08 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-06 5:38 [PATCH] mmc: agressive clocking framework v9 Philip Rakity
2010-11-06 17:24 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-06 17:38 ` Philip Rakity
2010-11-07 1:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-11-07 18:18 ` Philip Rakity
2010-11-08 4:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-11-08 9:40 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-08 9:45 ` Philip Rakity
2010-11-09 10:29 ` Jaehoon Chung
2010-11-09 16:52 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-07 9:32 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-08 9:37 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-08 9:47 ` Philip Rakity
2010-11-08 10:40 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-08 18:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-11-08 22:06 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-08 18:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-11-08 9:23 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-04 11:16 Linus Walleij
2010-11-04 13:15 ` David Vrabel
2010-11-04 14:25 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-04 17:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-11-05 8:35 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-05 10:03 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-04 21:20 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CD7C195.9000805@stericsson.com \
--to=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prakity@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox