public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: fixed wrong SD card detection
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 17:38:15 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DCB9C77.9090603@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m362ph51uf.fsf@pullcord.laptop.org>

Hi Chris..

Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
> 
> On Fri, May 06 2011, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> This patch added mmc_power_off after mmc_attach_sd()
>>
>> i found that didn't detect the second card insert.(using SDHCI)
>> you can see the below log.
>>
>> i want to know that somebody know this issue...
>>
>> ->first card inserted (correct card detect)
>> # mmc1: new SDHC card at address e624
>> mmcblk1: mmc1:e624 SU04G 3.69 GiB
>>  mmcblk1: p1
>> #
>> # mmc1: card e624 removed
>> -> second card inserted
>> mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising SD card
>> mmc1: Card removed during transfer!
>> mmc1: Resetting controller.
>> -> third card inserted 
>> mmc1: new SDHC card at address e624
>> mmcblk1: mmc1:e624 SU04G 3.69 GiB
>>  mmcblk1: p1
>>
>> I added mmc_power_off() after only mmc_attach_sd().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/core/core.c |    4 +++-
>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> index 1dbc185..d5d8ac0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> @@ -1522,8 +1522,10 @@ static int mmc_rescan_try_freq(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned freq)
>>  	/* Order's important: probe SDIO, then SD, then MMC */
>>  	if (!mmc_attach_sdio(host))
>>  		return 0;
>> -	if (!mmc_attach_sd(host))
>> +	if (!mmc_attach_sd(host)) {
>> +		mmc_power_off(host);
>>  		return 0;
>> +	}
>>  	if (!mmc_attach_mmc(host))
>>  		return 0;
>>  
> 
> It looks to me like this patch says "if we successfully attach/power up
> an SD card, then power it back off again immediately".  Why would that
> make sense?

It's non-sense...i know...How did you think about that problem..?
I want to get your advise...

> 
> - Chris.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-12  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-06  9:38 [PATCH] mmc: fixed wrong SD card detection Jaehoon Chung
2011-05-11  3:54 ` Chris Ball
2011-05-12  8:38   ` Jaehoon Chung [this message]
2011-05-11 10:30 ` Huang Changming-R66093
2011-05-12  5:14   ` Jaehoon Chung
2011-05-12  6:17     ` Huang Changming-R66093

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DCB9C77.9090603@samsung.com \
    --to=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox