From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MMC: Fix checkpatch complaints about long lines Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:58:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4DFEFDB5.9070805@atmel.com> References: <1308419437-18306-1-git-send-email-sebras@gmail.com> <20110619065048.GC1632@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from newsmtp5.atmel.com ([204.2.163.5]:51441 "EHLO sjogate2.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750717Ab1FTH7G (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2011 03:59:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110619065048.GC1632@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Sebastian Rasmussen , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Wolfram Sang Le 19/06/2011 08:50, Wolfram Sang : > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 07:50:37PM +0200, Sebastian Rasmussen wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Rasmussen > > I don't think it improves readability, so not worth the change IMO. I have the same feeling: can't we be more tolerant with this soft limit requirement? And for sure changing existing code only for this is a bad idea. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre