From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: J Freyensee Subject: Re: Testing Infrastructure for SD/MMC Commands Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:03:56 -0700 Message-ID: <4E4A94EC.7040606@linux.intel.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:38774 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752012Ab1HPQCx (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:02:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Shashidhar Hiremath Cc: cjb@laptop.org, Will Newton , Jae hoon Chung , James Hogan , kyungmin.park@samsung.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On 08/16/2011 02:26 AM, Shashidhar Hiremath wrote: > adding mmc mailing list > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Shashidhar Hiremath > wrote: >> Hi All, >> i am planning to come up with a module that would help for testing >> the SD/MMC controller to see if supports the particular command. >> >> For example ,Through this module , we will be able to see if a >> particular command has been accepted by the device and whether device >> has responded in the expected manner or not by checking its response. >> >> Can I get some points on how useful this infrastructure would be ,and >> any inputs on what else to cover under this ? >> > It sounds like you are looking to design a functional model, a module that utilizes some type of design spec or standard to verify if the design implementation works according to the design-spec/standard, correct? If true, my first question would be, what document will you be basing this module on? It probably could be useful- the more testing on something the better. But I think the first step is you need to define what document/spec/standard this module is going to follow, then how this module is going to be designed and used, then go from there. > > -- J (James/Jay) Freyensee Storage Technology Group Intel Corporation