From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: J Freyensee Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Fix the incorrect calculation for erase unit size. Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:27:49 -0700 Message-ID: <4E692545.9050707@linux.intel.com> References: <1315461565-16009-1-git-send-email-tgih.jun@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1315461565-16009-1-git-send-email-tgih.jun@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Seungwon Jeon Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, cjb@laptop.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, dh.han@samsung.com List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On 09/07/2011 10:59 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > Erase unit size of high capacity is multiple of 512KiB not 1024KiB. I'm just wondering, what are these patches based off of? I have not been able to connect to anything hosted by kernel.org since I came back from vacation due to the security breach on kernel.org. > > Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon > --- > drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c > index b148bb1..7991ecf 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c > @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static int mmc_read_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card, u8 *ext_csd) > card->ext_csd.hc_erase_timeout = 300 * > ext_csd[EXT_CSD_ERASE_TIMEOUT_MULT]; > card->ext_csd.hc_erase_size = > - ext_csd[EXT_CSD_HC_ERASE_GRP_SIZE]<< 10; > + ext_csd[EXT_CSD_HC_ERASE_GRP_SIZE]<< 9; > > card->ext_csd.rel_sectors = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_REL_WR_SEC_C]; > > -- > 1.7.0.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- J (James/Jay) Freyensee Storage Technology Group Intel Corporation