From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: SDHCI regression since 2.6.39 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:20:16 -0700 Message-ID: <4E6FBB00.9090803@goop.org> References: <4E6EA3E4.5080401@goop.org> <4E6F8C24.3090207@goop.org> <4E6FA44F.1050705@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:35558 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932470Ab1IMUUU (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:20:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Ball Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Manoj Iyer On 09/13/2011 11:49 AM, Chris Ball wrote: > I just asked Matthew Garrett to check his X220, and his has the same e823 > controller as you, is running a 3.1-rc kernel, and everything's working. > > So it's not even variation in the controller model, it's something even > more subtle. Perhaps try some different cards? What capacity/speed is > the one you're trying? If there is a per-card difference, I suppose > we'd expect it to be that slower cards work and faster cards fail > (given the nature of the patch I linked in my last mail). I have two: a PNY 8GB Class 10 card, and an EyeFi Connect X2 4GB, class 6. J