Re: slow eMMC write speed

Praveen G K
2011-09-28T20:34:19Z

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:59 PM, J Freyensee
<james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 09/28/2011 12:06 PM, Praveen G K wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Linus Walleij
>> <linus.walleij@linaro.org>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Praveen G K<praveen.gk@gmail.com>
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am working on the block driver module of the eMMC driver (SDIO 3.0
>>>> controller).  I am seeing very low write speed for eMMC transfers.  On
>>>> further debugging, I observed that every 63rd and 64th transfer takes
>>>> a long time.
>>>
>>> Are you not just seeing the card-internal garbage collection?
>>> http://lwn.net/Articles/428584/
>>
>> Does this mean, theoretically, I should be able to achieve larger
>> speeds if I am not using linux?
>
> In theory in a fairy-tale world, maybe, in reality, not really.  In R/W
> performance measurements we have done, eMMC performance in products users
> would buy falls well, well short of any theoretical numbers.  We believe in
> theory, the eMMC interface should be able to support up to 100MB/s, but in
> reality on real customer platforms write bandwidths (for example) barely
> approach 20MB/s, regardless if it's a Microsoft Windows environment or
> Android (Linux OS environment we care about).  So maybe it is software
> implementation issues of multiple OSs preventing higher eMMC performance
> numbers (hence the reason why I sometimes ask basic coding questions of the
> MMC subsystem- the code isn't the easiest to follow); however, one looks no
> further than what Apple has done with the iPad2 to see that eMMC probably
> just is not a good solution to use in the first place.  We have measured
> Apple's iPad2 write performance on *WHAT A USER WOULD SEE* being double what
> we see with products using eMMC solutions. The big difference?  Apple
> doesn't use eMMC at all for the iPad2.

Thanks for all the clarification. The problem is I am seeing write
speeds of about 5MBps on a Sandisk eMMC product and I can clearly see
the time lost when measured between sending a command and receiving a
data irq. I am not sure what kind of an issue this is. 5MBps feels
really slow but can the internal housekeeping of the card take so much
time? I mean, for the usual transfers it takes about 3ms to transfer
64kB of data, but for the 63rd and 64th transfers, it takes 250 ms.
The thing is this is not on a file system. I am measuring the speed
using basic "dd" command to write directly to the block device.

> So, is this a software issue? or if
>>
>> there is a way to increase the size of bounce buffers to 4MB?
>>
>
>
>
>>> Yours,
>>> Linus Walleij
>>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
> --
> J (James/Jay) Freyensee
> Storage Technology Group
> Intel Corporation
>