From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Stefan NILSSON9 <stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mmc: mmci: Bugfix in pio read for small packets
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:23:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E92AB66.1030406@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdY=DFW+J_pQetK38mPqic2iBuDWCx5QZTo-NkL1L37Fuw@mail.gmail.com>
Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 03:45:48PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>
>> Well, the patch system says that each one depends on the previous one,
>> and the first one in the series contains the PIO read thing.
>>
>> Do 7108/1 onwards depend on 7106/1 and 7107/1 ?
>
> Probably my fault, since I was helping Ulf out with the patch tracker
> introduction.
>
> The patches should be pretty much semantically orthogonal as
> far as I can tell, the only reason dependency was stated that way
> was that I couldn't tell from head-parsing whether there were
> syntactical dependencies. (And wanted to avoid the annoyance
> of non-applying patches...)
>
> So if they apply, they are independent AFAICT.
7108/1 and 7109/1, have real dependencies. Otherwise there none.
BR
Ulf Hansson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-27 7:46 [PATCH 1/4] mmc: mmci: Bugfix in pio read for small packets Ulf Hansson
2011-10-01 16:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-03 7:08 ` Stefan Nilsson XK
2011-10-07 13:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-07 19:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-14 7:38 ` Stefan Nilsson XK
2011-10-07 13:45 ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-08 9:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-09 6:59 ` Linus Walleij
2011-10-10 8:23 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2011-10-13 15:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-14 8:07 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E92AB66.1030406@stericsson.com \
--to=ulf.hansson@stericsson.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).