From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: mmci: Do not release spinlock in request_end Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:33:47 +0300 Message-ID: <4E956D0B.8060803@intel.com> References: <1318342001-26955-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:64249 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750850Ab1JLKdv (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 06:33:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Ulf Hansson , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , Lee Jones On 12/10/11 12:41, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > >> The patch "mmc: core: move ->request() call from atomic context", >> is the reason to why this change is possible. This simplifies the >> error handling code execution path quite a lot and potentially also >> fixes some error handling hang problems. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson > > Adrian do you agree with this? Yes > > To me it looks correct, > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > > Yours, > Linus Walleij