From: Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@codeaurora.org>
To: Per Forlin <per.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: David Taylor <dmtaylor@skytex.net>, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Kill block requests if card is removed
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:01:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ECE2B03.5000501@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEEs1nBFFLNvRDfwFkkp5SaifmKeykS-jrEtiSHw2ahR_38Zg@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/24/2011 3:00 PM, Per Forlin wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:18 PM, David Taylor<dmtaylor@skytex.net> wrote:
>> Sujit Reddy Thumma<sthumma<at> codeaurora.org> writes:
>>
>>>
>>> Kill block requests when the host knows that the card is
>>> removed from the slot and is sure that subsequent requests
>>> are bound to fail. Do this silently so that the block
>>> layer doesn't output unnecessary error messages.
>>>
>>> This patch implements suggestion from Adrian Hunter,
>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/2714/focus=3474
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sujit Reddy Thumma<sthumma<at> codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 5 +++++
>>> drivers/mmc/core/bus.c | 2 ++
>>> include/linux/mmc/card.h | 3 +++
>>> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, this patch worked nicely to control a seemingly endless series of
>> driver complaints when the SD card was removed during a transfer.
>>
>> The OMAP4 I'm working on has hardware assisted detection of card removal, and
>> this patch looks like it will be sufficient.
>>
> What happens if you run "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/mmcblk0 bs=1M
> count=1000" and during dd the card is ejected?
> When I test this, the host is claimed until the dd has tried to
> transfer all 1000MB.
That is true only when we are using >3.0 kernel.
--
Thanks,
Sujit
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-24 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-09 4:31 [PATCH] mmc: core: Kill block requests if card is removed Sujit Reddy Thumma
2011-11-09 9:34 ` Adrian Hunter
2011-11-09 20:53 ` Per Forlin
2011-11-09 22:05 ` Per Forlin
2011-11-10 4:13 ` Sujit Reddy Thumma
2011-11-10 4:02 ` Sujit Reddy Thumma
2011-11-10 9:35 ` Adrian Hunter
2011-11-10 14:20 ` Per Forlin
2011-11-14 4:19 ` Sujit Reddy Thumma
2011-11-14 7:52 ` Per Forlin
2011-11-14 8:24 ` Per Forlin
2011-11-14 8:46 ` Sujit Reddy Thumma
2011-11-09 21:47 ` Per Forlin
2011-11-10 5:31 ` Sujit Reddy Thumma
2011-11-22 20:18 ` David Taylor
2011-11-24 9:30 ` Per Forlin
2011-11-24 11:31 ` Sujit Reddy Thumma [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ECE2B03.5000501@codeaurora.org \
--to=sthumma@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dmtaylor@skytex.net \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=per.lkml@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox