From: Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@codeaurora.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: per.lkml@gmail.com,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] mmc: Kill block requests if card is removed
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:36:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EF1BDA7.6070903@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE081CF.3010303@intel.com>
On 12/8/2011 2:52 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 08/12/11 10:35, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote:
>> Kill block requests when the host realizes that the card is
>> removed from the slot and is sure that subsequent requests
>> are bound to fail. Do this silently so that the block
>> layer doesn't output unnecessary error messages.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sujit Reddy Thumma<sthumma@codeaurora.org>
>
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter<adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>
Thanks Adrian.
Chris can you pull this patch with Adrian's ack?
Thanks,
Sujit
>>
>> ---
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Extra check to make sure no further commands are sent
>> in error case when the card is removed.
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Dropped dependency on Per's patch and is now dependent
>> on "[PATCH V4] mmc: allow upper layers to determine immediately
>> if a card has been removed" by Adrian Hunter.
>> - Modified commit text slightly as Adrian has
>> implemented his own suggestion in a different patch.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Changed the implementation with further comments from Adrian
>> - Set the card removed flag in bus notifier callbacks
>> - This patch is now dependent on patch from Per Forlin:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/11128/focus=11211
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 5 +++++
>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
>> index 0c959c9..0cad48a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
>> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ enum mmc_blk_status {
>> MMC_BLK_ABORT,
>> MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR,
>> MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR,
>> + MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM,
>> };
>>
>> module_param(perdev_minors, int, 0444);
>> @@ -639,6 +640,7 @@ static int get_card_status(struct mmc_card *card, u32 *status, int retries)
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> +#define ERR_NOMEDIUM 3
>> #define ERR_RETRY 2
>> #define ERR_ABORT 1
>> #define ERR_CONTINUE 0
>> @@ -706,6 +708,9 @@ static int mmc_blk_cmd_recovery(struct mmc_card *card, struct request *req,
>> u32 status, stop_status = 0;
>> int err, retry;
>>
>> + if (mmc_card_removed(card))
>> + return ERR_NOMEDIUM;
>> +
>> /*
>> * Try to get card status which indicates both the card state
>> * and why there was no response. If the first attempt fails,
>> @@ -722,8 +727,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_cmd_recovery(struct mmc_card *card, struct request *req,
>> }
>>
>> /* We couldn't get a response from the card. Give up. */
>> - if (err)
>> + if (err) {
>> + /* Check if the card is removed */
>> + if (mmc_detect_card_removed(card->host))
>> + return ERR_NOMEDIUM;
>> return ERR_ABORT;
>> + }
>>
>> /* Flag ECC errors */
>> if ((status& R1_CARD_ECC_FAILED) ||
>> @@ -996,6 +1005,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_err_check(struct mmc_card *card,
>> return MMC_BLK_RETRY;
>> case ERR_ABORT:
>> return MMC_BLK_ABORT;
>> + case ERR_NOMEDIUM:
>> + return MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM;
>> case ERR_CONTINUE:
>> break;
>> }
>> @@ -1329,6 +1340,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
>> if (!ret)
>> goto start_new_req;
>> break;
>> + case MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM:
>> + goto cmd_abort;
>> }
>>
>> if (ret) {
>> @@ -1345,6 +1358,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
>>
>> cmd_abort:
>> spin_lock_irq(&md->lock);
>> + if (mmc_card_removed(card))
>> + req->cmd_flags |= REQ_QUIET;
>> while (ret)
>> ret = __blk_end_request(req, -EIO, blk_rq_cur_bytes(req));
>> spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
>> index dcad59c..2517547 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
>> */
>> static int mmc_prep_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req)
>> {
>> + struct mmc_queue *mq = q->queuedata;
>> +
>> /*
>> * We only like normal block requests and discards.
>> */
>> @@ -37,6 +39,9 @@ static int mmc_prep_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req)
>> return BLKPREP_KILL;
>> }
>>
>> + if (mq&& mmc_card_removed(mq->card))
>> + return BLKPREP_KILL;
>> +
>> req->cmd_flags |= REQ_DONTPREP;
>>
>> return BLKPREP_OK;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-21 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-08 8:35 [PATCH V4] mmc: Kill block requests if card is removed Sujit Reddy Thumma
2011-12-08 9:22 ` Adrian Hunter
2011-12-21 11:06 ` Sujit Reddy Thumma [this message]
2011-12-25 1:58 ` Chris Ball
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EF1BDA7.6070903@codeaurora.org \
--to=sthumma@codeaurora.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=per.lkml@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).