From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci: Deal with failure case in sdhci_suspend_host
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:23:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EFB0A44.5070006@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1325041873-1320-3-git-send-email-aaron.lu@amd.com>
On 28/12/11 05:11, Aaron Lu wrote:
> If there are errors happened in sdhci_suspend_host, handle it so that
> when the function returns with error, the host's behaviour is the same
> before this function call, e.g. card detection is enabled and tuning
> timer is active, etc.
>
> Previously, sdhci_suspend_host will return the error code and rely on
> the calling function to handle it. sdhci-pci will handle it in
> sdhci_pci_suspend while sdhci-platform code will not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c | 9 ++-------
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
> index d2e77fb..494d14b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
> @@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ static int sdhci_pci_suspend(struct device *dev)
> ret = sdhci_suspend_host(slot->host);
>
> if (ret)
> - goto err_pci_suspend;
> + return ret;
>
> slot_pm_flags = slot->host->mmc->pm_flags;
> if (slot_pm_flags & MMC_PM_WAKE_SDIO_IRQ)
> @@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ static int sdhci_pci_suspend(struct device *dev)
> if (chip->fixes && chip->fixes->suspend) {
> ret = chip->fixes->suspend(chip);
> if (ret)
> - goto err_pci_suspend;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> pci_save_state(pdev);
> @@ -1042,11 +1042,6 @@ static int sdhci_pci_suspend(struct device *dev)
> }
>
> return 0;
> -
> -err_pci_suspend:
> - while (--i >= 0)
> - sdhci_resume_host(chip->slots[i]->host);
> - return ret;
This doesn't look right. This is about having multiple
host controllers on the same PCI device. If those
hosts have been successfully suspended, then they must
be resumed on error.
> }
>
> static int sdhci_pci_resume(struct device *dev)
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 2007d37..37aeb81 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -2339,25 +2339,40 @@ out:
>
> int sdhci_suspend_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret, has_tuning_timer;
>
> sdhci_disable_card_detection(host);
>
> /* Disable tuning since we are suspending */
> - if (host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_300 && host->tuning_count &&
> - host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1) {
> + has_tuning_timer = host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_300 &&
> + host->tuning_count && host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1;
> + if (has_tuning_timer) {
> del_timer_sync(&host->tuning_timer);
> host->flags &= ~SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING;
> }
>
> ret = mmc_suspend_host(host->mmc);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto err_suspend;
> +
> + if (host->vmmc) {
> + ret = regulator_disable(host->vmmc);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_suspend;
> + }
>
> free_irq(host->irq, host);
>
> - if (host->vmmc)
> - ret = regulator_disable(host->vmmc);
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_suspend:
> + if (has_tuning_timer) {
> + host->flags |= SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING;
> + mod_timer(&host->tuning_timer, jiffies +
> + host->tuning_count * HZ);
> + }
> +
> + sdhci_enable_card_detection(host);
>
> return ret;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-28 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-28 3:11 [PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci: Fix for sdhci suspend function Aaron Lu
2011-12-28 3:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci: Fix tuning timer incorrect setting when suspending host Aaron Lu
2011-12-28 12:24 ` Adrian Hunter
2011-12-28 3:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci: Deal with failure case in sdhci_suspend_host Aaron Lu
2011-12-28 12:23 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2011-12-29 2:32 ` Aaron Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EFB0A44.5070006@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@amd.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prakity@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).