From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Per FORLIN <per.forlin@stericsson.com>,
Johan RUDHOLM <johan.rudholm@stericsson.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V3] mmc: core: Detect card removal on I/O error
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 12:18:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F2BC2A0.9080805@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKYAXd8oBqXPbDdH8YyncstM+VE92fzhF1QoH7kC4=-aG2mpdA@mail.gmail.com>
Namjae Jeon wrote:
> 2012/2/3 Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>:
>> On 02/03/2012 06:33 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>
>>> To prevent I/O as soon as possible at card removal, a new
>>> detect work is re-scheduled without a delay to let a rescan
>>> remove the card device as soon a possible.
>>>
>>> Additionally, MMC_CAP2_DETECT_ON_ERR can now be used to handle
>>> "slowly" removed cards that a scheduled detect work did not
>>> detect as removed. To prevent further I/O requests for these
>>> lingering removed cards, check if card has been removed and then
>>> schedule a detect work to properly remove it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - Check for card is NULL and minor code simplifications.
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Updated according to review comments.
>>> - Merging two patches for this feature into one.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>>> index bec0bf2..9645e8c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>>> @@ -2077,18 +2077,36 @@ int _mmc_detect_card_removed(struct mmc_host *host)
>>> int mmc_detect_card_removed(struct mmc_host *host)
>>> {
>>> struct mmc_card *card = host->card;
>>> + int ret;
>>>
>>> WARN_ON(!host->claimed);
>>> +
>>> + if (!card)
>>> + return 1;
>>> +
>>> + ret = mmc_card_removed(card);
>> this function called mmc_detect_card_removed(card->host) in block.c.
>> then card isn't NULL..isn't?
>> Just wondering... :)
Yes, if called from block device thread (block.c) card is always present.
> If we think this function is used anywhere else next time, it is reasonable.
> And old code also checked null.
That is why I also agree that this should be checked. It is an exported
function and who know if it is going to used from some other context in
future.
>> Best Regards,
>> Jaehoon Chung
>>
>>> /*
>>> * The card will be considered unchanged unless we have been asked to
>>> * detect a change or host requires polling to provide card detection.
>>> */
>>> - if (card && !host->detect_change && !(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL))
>>> - return mmc_card_removed(card);
>>> + if (!host->detect_change && !(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL) &&
>>> + !(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_DETECT_ON_ERR))
>>> + return ret;
>>>
>>> host->detect_change = 0;
>>> + if (!ret) {
>>> + ret = _mmc_detect_card_removed(host);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * Schedule a detect work as soon as possible to let a
>>> + * rescan handle the card removal.
>>> + */
>>> + cancel_delayed_work(&host->detect);
>>> + mmc_detect_change(host, 0);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>>
>>> - return _mmc_detect_card_removed(host);
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_detect_card_removed);
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> index dd13e05..368a2b9 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
>>> #define MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR (1 << 6) /* can support */
>>> #define MMC_CAP2_HS200 (MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_8V_SDR | \
>>> MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR)
>>> +#define MMC_CAP2_DETECT_ON_ERR (1 << 7) /* On I/O err check card removal */
>>>
>>> mmc_pm_flag_t pm_caps; /* supported pm features */
>>> unsigned int power_notify_type;
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-03 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-03 9:33 [RESEND PATCH V3] mmc: core: Detect card removal on I/O error Ulf Hansson
2012-02-03 9:46 ` Namjae Jeon
2012-02-03 10:34 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-02-03 11:00 ` Namjae Jeon
2012-02-03 11:18 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2012-02-03 11:49 ` Jae hoon Chung
2012-02-03 11:40 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-02-03 12:16 ` Ulf Hansson
2012-02-03 12:52 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-02-03 13:23 ` Ulf Hansson
2012-02-06 9:02 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-02-06 9:27 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F2BC2A0.9080805@stericsson.com \
--to=ulf.hansson@stericsson.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=johan.rudholm@stericsson.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linkinjeon@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=per.forlin@stericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).