linux-mmc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
To: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
	Per FORLIN <per.forlin@stericsson.com>,
	Johan RUDHOLM <johan.rudholm@stericsson.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Clean up after mmc_pre_req if card was removed
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:51:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F508A24.50707@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F508493.2000107@samsung.com>

Hi Jaehoon,

I did not know this. Which host driver are you using? I would very much 
appreciate of you could debug and share some result.

Thanks!

BR
Ulf Hansson

On 03/02/2012 09:28 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Ulf.
>
> I tested with this patch.
> But in my environment, this patch didn't work fine before.
> 1) When remove/insert, didn't entered the suspend.
> 2) When removed during something write,
> [   50.755067] FAT-fs (mmcblk1p1): Directory bread(block 8254) failed
> [   50.761235] FAT-fs (mmcblk1p1): Directory bread(block 8255) failed
> then at next-time, didn't detect sd-card.
>
> Did you know this?
> If you want more information, i will debug, and share the result.
>
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
>
> On 03/02/2012 12:44 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
>> Make sure mmc_start_req cancel the prepared job, if the request
>> was prevented to be started due to the card has been removed.
>>
>> This bug was introduced in commit:
>> mmc: allow upper layers to know immediately if card has been removed
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson<ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mmc/core/core.c |   35 +++++++++++++++--------------------
>>   1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> index 0b317f0..9e562ab 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> @@ -249,16 +249,17 @@ static void mmc_wait_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
>>   	complete(&mrq->completion);
>>   }
>>
>> -static void __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>> +static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>>   {
>>   	init_completion(&mrq->completion);
>>   	mrq->done = mmc_wait_done;
>>   	if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
>>   		mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>>   		complete(&mrq->completion);
>> -		return;
>> +		return -ENOMEDIUM;
>>   	}
>>   	mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
>> +	return 0;
>>   }
>>
>>   static void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host *host,
>> @@ -342,6 +343,7 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
>>   				    struct mmc_async_req *areq, int *error)
>>   {
>>   	int err = 0;
>> +	int start_err = 0;
>>   	struct mmc_async_req *data = host->areq;
>>
>>   	/* Prepare a new request */
>> @@ -351,30 +353,23 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
>>   	if (host->areq) {
>>   		mmc_wait_for_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq);
>>   		err = host->areq->err_check(host->card, host->areq);
>> -		if (err) {
>> -			/* post process the completed failed request */
>> -			mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0);
>> -			if (areq)
>> -				/*
>> -				 * Cancel the new prepared request, because
>> -				 * it can't run until the failed
>> -				 * request has been properly handled.
>> -				 */
>> -				mmc_post_req(host, areq->mrq, -EINVAL);
>> -
>> -			host->areq = NULL;
>> -			goto out;
>> -		}
>>   	}
>>
>> -	if (areq)
>> -		__mmc_start_req(host, areq->mrq);
>> +	if (!err&&  areq)
>> +		start_err = __mmc_start_req(host, areq->mrq);
>>
>>   	if (host->areq)
>>   		mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0);
>>
>> -	host->areq = areq;
>> - out:
>> +	if (err || start_err) {
>> +		if (areq)
>> +			/* The prepared request was not started, cancel it. */
>> +			mmc_post_req(host, areq->mrq, -EINVAL);
>> +		host->areq = NULL;
>> +	} else {
>> +		host->areq = areq;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	if (error)
>>   		*error = err;
>>   	return data;
>
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-02  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-01 15:44 [PATCH] mmc: core: Clean up after mmc_pre_req if card was removed Ulf Hansson
2012-03-01 18:42 ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-02  6:38 ` Per Förlin
2012-03-02  8:28 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-02  8:51   ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2012-03-02 15:29     ` Per Förlin
2012-03-05  5:08       ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-05  6:08         ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-05  8:35           ` Per Förlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F508A24.50707@stericsson.com \
    --to=ulf.hansson@stericsson.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=johan.rudholm@stericsson.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=per.forlin@stericsson.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).