From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
To: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: Ulf HANSSON <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Per FORLIN <per.forlin@stericsson.com>,
Johan RUDHOLM <johan.rudholm@stericsson.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] mmc: core: Detect card removal on I/O error
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:10:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F54D75B.1070408@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328521359-31962-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
Hi Chris,
Just wondering if you see any issues with proceeding with this patch?
Thanks!
Br
Ulf Hansson
On 02/06/2012 10:42 AM, Ulf HANSSON wrote:
> To prevent I/O as soon as possible at card removal, a new
> detect work is re-scheduled without a delay to let a rescan
> remove the card device as soon a possible.
>
> Additionally, MMC_CAP2_DETECT_ON_ERR can now be used to handle
> "slowly" removed cards that a scheduled detect work did not
> detect as removed. To prevent further I/O requests for these
> lingering removed cards, check if card has been removed and then
> schedule a detect work to properly remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson<ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Rebased on latest mmc-next branch.
> - Prevent scheduling a second not needed detect work.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Check for card is NULL and minor code simplifications.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Updated according to review comments.
> - Merging two patches for this feature into one.
>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index 8a19143..a8f7efe 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -2112,18 +2112,36 @@ int _mmc_detect_card_removed(struct mmc_host *host)
> int mmc_detect_card_removed(struct mmc_host *host)
> {
> struct mmc_card *card = host->card;
> + int ret;
>
> WARN_ON(!host->claimed);
> +
> + if (!card)
> + return 1;
> +
> + ret = mmc_card_removed(card);
> /*
> * The card will be considered unchanged unless we have been asked to
> * detect a change or host requires polling to provide card detection.
> */
> - if (card&& !host->detect_change&& !(host->caps& MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL))
> - return mmc_card_removed(card);
> + if (!host->detect_change&& !(host->caps& MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)&&
> + !(host->caps2& MMC_CAP2_DETECT_ON_ERR))
> + return ret;
>
> host->detect_change = 0;
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = _mmc_detect_card_removed(host);
> + if (ret&& (host->caps2& MMC_CAP2_DETECT_ON_ERR)) {
> + /*
> + * Schedule a detect work as soon as possible to let a
> + * rescan handle the card removal.
> + */
> + cancel_delayed_work(&host->detect);
> + mmc_detect_change(host, 0);
> + }
> + }
>
> - return _mmc_detect_card_removed(host);
> + return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_detect_card_removed);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> index 20d7c82..e9f9e88 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
> #define MMC_CAP2_HS200 (MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_8V_SDR | \
> MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR)
> #define MMC_CAP2_BROKEN_VOLTAGE (1<< 7) /* Use the broken voltage */
> +#define MMC_CAP2_DETECT_ON_ERR (1<< 8) /* On I/O err check card removal */
>
> mmc_pm_flag_t pm_caps; /* supported pm features */
> unsigned int power_notify_type;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-05 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-06 9:42 [PATCH V4] mmc: core: Detect card removal on I/O error Ulf Hansson
2012-02-06 17:31 ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-05 15:10 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2012-03-05 15:47 ` Chris Ball
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F54D75B.1070408@stericsson.com \
--to=ulf.hansson@stericsson.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=johan.rudholm@stericsson.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=per.forlin@stericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox