From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Per FORLIN <per.forlin@stericsson.com>,
Johan RUDHOLM <johan.rudholm@stericsson.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mmc: core: Clean up after mmc_pre_req if card was removed
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:24:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F56F0FE.4020606@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F563AC1.5020708@stericsson.com>
Hi Ulf.
I tested with patch-v2, i didn't found the other problem.
It looks good.
Tested-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 03/07/2012 01:26 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
>
> I would be very interested to hear if you still encounter any problems with this V2 patch? If you are able to do a test it would be highly appreciated. :-)
>
> Just for reference, I were able to reproduce problems similar to what you have for the V1 patch.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best regards
> Ulf Hansson
>
>
> On 03/05/2012 03:52 PM, Ulf HANSSON wrote:
>> Make sure mmc_start_req cancel the prepared job, if the request
>> was prevented to be started due to the card has been removed.
>>
>> This bug was introduced in commit:
>> mmc: allow upper layers to know immediately if card has been removed
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson<ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Per Forlin<per.forlin@stericsson.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Maintain handling of host->areq (host->areq must not be NULL when
>> "start_err"), to make sure the block layer is able to respond to all
>> of the started requests.
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 35 +++++++++++++++--------------------
>> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> index faa0af1..56b7a24 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> @@ -249,16 +249,17 @@ static void mmc_wait_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
>> complete(&mrq->completion);
>> }
>>
>> -static void __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>> +static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>> {
>> init_completion(&mrq->completion);
>> mrq->done = mmc_wait_done;
>> if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
>> mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>> complete(&mrq->completion);
>> - return;
>> + return -ENOMEDIUM;
>> }
>> mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host *host,
>> @@ -342,6 +343,7 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
>> struct mmc_async_req *areq, int *error)
>> {
>> int err = 0;
>> + int start_err = 0;
>> struct mmc_async_req *data = host->areq;
>>
>> /* Prepare a new request */
>> @@ -351,30 +353,23 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
>> if (host->areq) {
>> mmc_wait_for_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq);
>> err = host->areq->err_check(host->card, host->areq);
>> - if (err) {
>> - /* post process the completed failed request */
>> - mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0);
>> - if (areq)
>> - /*
>> - * Cancel the new prepared request, because
>> - * it can't run until the failed
>> - * request has been properly handled.
>> - */
>> - mmc_post_req(host, areq->mrq, -EINVAL);
>> -
>> - host->areq = NULL;
>> - goto out;
>> - }
>> }
>>
>> - if (areq)
>> - __mmc_start_req(host, areq->mrq);
>> + if (!err&& areq)
>> + start_err = __mmc_start_req(host, areq->mrq);
>>
>> if (host->areq)
>> mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0);
>>
>> - host->areq = areq;
>> - out:
>> + /* Cancel a prepared request if it was not started. */
>> + if ((err || start_err)&& areq)
>> + mmc_post_req(host, areq->mrq, -EINVAL);
>> +
>> + if (err)
>> + host->areq = NULL;
>> + else
>> + host->areq = areq;
>> +
>> if (error)
>> *error = err;
>> return data;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-07 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-05 14:52 [PATCH V2] mmc: core: Clean up after mmc_pre_req if card was removed Ulf Hansson
2012-03-06 16:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2012-03-07 5:24 ` Jaehoon Chung [this message]
2012-03-08 12:15 ` Ulf Hansson
2012-03-09 4:40 ` Chris Ball
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F56F0FE.4020606@samsung.com \
--to=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=johan.rudholm@stericsson.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=per.forlin@stericsson.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@stericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).