From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Stigge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: of_get_named_gpio_flags() return -EPROBE_DEFER if GPIO not yet available Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:23:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4FDF47D8.9000309@antcom.de> References: <1339927893-8842-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <4FDE8D27.6030508@wwwdotorg.org> <4FDEF293.9080305@antcom.de> <4FDF403E.9090302@wwwdotorg.org> <4FDF4461.60707@antcom.de> <4FDF4543.6090009@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FDF4543.6090009@wwwdotorg.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: cjb@laptop.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, rob.herring@calxeda.com, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, ulf.hansson@stericsson.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aletes.xgr@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On 06/18/2012 05:12 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> Thanks for the hint! I previously also suspected sth. like this but >> didn't find it in v3.5-rc3. In broonie's sound.git for-next, I now >> finally found it. >> >> Should be easy to fix (replacing the if (... == -ENODEV) to -EPROBE_DEFER. >> >> Will you provide patches as signalled, of should I? Which branch would >> be the correct one to build on top? > > I'm happy either way. It'd probably be best to roll the change into your > patch/series so you can manage all the dependencies in one series, but > if you can't for some reason, I'm happy to provide a patch for this. I should be able ;-) - is broonie's sound.git, branch for-next the correct one to patch against? Or sth. better suited? Thanks in advance, Roland