public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>
Cc: cjb@laptop.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sdhci: poll for card even when card is logically unremovable
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:23:01 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF6A065.9050700@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120705210613.8B3F89D401E@zog.reactivated.net>

Hi Daniel,

When enabled MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME, it assumed that card didn't remove
during suspend/resume.
If you need to remove the card during suspend/resume,
why enable MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME?

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

On 07/06/2012 06:06 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:

> The Marvell CaFe is now marked as having bad card detection to fix
> a problem during system resume.
> 
> Now on the OLPC XO-1 we are facing the issue that the card is marked
> as logically unremovable (via MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME), which means that
> mmc_card_is_removable considers the card non-removable. The existing
> code logic decides not to poll for card presence in this case, and
> card detection is also disabled because of the quirk being set.
> This means that no SD cards are detected when inserted after boot.
> 
> Refine the logic to enable card presence polling in the case when
> a card is logically unremovable, only avoiding the poll in the case
> when the card is physically non-removable (denoted with
> MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index f4b8b4d..dd71a05 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -2779,7 +2779,7 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  		mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
>  
>  	if ((host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION) &&
> -	    mmc_card_is_removable(mmc))
> +	    !(host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE))
>  		mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL;
>  
>  	/* Any UHS-I mode in caps implies SDR12 and SDR25 support. */



  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-06  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-05 21:06 [PATCH] sdhci: poll for card even when card is logically unremovable Daniel Drake
2012-07-06  8:23 ` Jaehoon Chung [this message]
2012-07-06 14:49   ` Daniel Drake
2012-07-10  3:16 ` Chris Ball

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FF6A065.9050700@samsung.com \
    --to=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=dsd@laptop.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox