From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Hansson Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] mmc: mmci: Fix incorrect handling of HW flow control for SDIO Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:24:16 +0200 Message-ID: <50780BF0.3070907@stericsson.com> References: <1349885000-22887-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <20121012091322.GC21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121012115448.GH21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eu1sys200aog110.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.129]:54307 "EHLO eu1sys200aog110.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751810Ab2JLMZY (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:25:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20121012115448.GH21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Linus Walleij , Chris Ball , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Ulf Hansson , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On 10/12/2012 01:54 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:13:22AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 06:03:19PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> From: Ulf Hansson >>> >>> For data writes<= 8 bytes, HW flow control was disabled but >>> never re-enabled when the transfer was completed. This meant >>> that a following read request would give buffer overrun errors. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson >> >> Both look fine to me too. Linus' has already said what needs to happen >> with these two. Thanks. > > Ulf, > > I see you've tried three times to get a replacement password for the > patch system today. If it's not getting through, you need to complain > to your IT department, and get them to complain to Google: > > 2012-10-12 11:09:21 1TMcBE-0005ED-VS<= apache@arm.linux.org.uk H=n2100.arm.linux.org.uk [2002:4e20:1eda:1:214:fdff:fe10:4f86]:55740 I=[2002:4e20:1eda:1:24c:69ff:fe6e:7578]:25 P=esmtpsa X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256 A=cram:n2100.arm.linux.org.uk S=1065 id=E1TMcBD-00061o-HP@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk T="Your new password" for ulf.hansson@stericsson.com > 2012-10-12 11:09:24 1TMcBE-0005ED-VS => ulf.hansson@stericsson.com R=verp_dnslookup T=verp_smtp S=1097 H=stericsson.com.s200a1.psmtp.com [207.126.147.10] X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256 DN="/C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=*.psmtp.com" C="250 Thanks" > 2012-10-12 11:25:13 1TMcQb-0005EY-8d<= apache@arm.linux.org.uk H=n2100.arm.linux.org.uk [2002:4e20:1eda:1:214:fdff:fe10:4f86]:37918 I=[2002:4e20:1eda:1:24c:69ff:fe6e:7578]:25 P=esmtpsa X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256 A=cram:n2100.arm.linux.org.uk S=1065 id=E1TMcQZ-00066s-2O@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk T="Your new password" for ulf.hansson@stericsson.com > 2012-10-12 11:25:17 1TMcQb-0005EY-8d => ulf.hansson@stericsson.com R=verp_dnslookup T=verp_smtp S=1097 H=stericsson.com.s200a1.psmtp.com [207.126.147.10] X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256 DN="/C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=*.psmtp.com" C="250 Thanks" > 2012-10-12 12:25:56 1TMdNM-0005IG-8u<= apache@arm.linux.org.uk H=n2100.arm.linux.org.uk [2002:4e20:1eda:1:214:fdff:fe10:4f86]:57521 I=[2002:4e20:1eda:1:24c:69ff:fe6e:7578]:25 P=esmtpsa X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256 A=cram:n2100.arm.linux.org.uk S=1065 id=E1TMdNK-0006XU-SG@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk T="Your new password" for ulf.hansson@stericsson.com > 2012-10-12 12:25:59 1TMdNM-0005IG-8u => ulf.hansson@stericsson.com R=verp_dnslookup T=verp_smtp S=1097 H=stericsson.com.s200a1.psmtp.com [207.126.147.10] X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256 DN="/C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=*.psmtp.com" C="250 Thanks" > > You are not the first to encounter this problem. psmtp.com seems to > put the password reminders into a big black hole, and this is inspite > of them trying to follow every possible RFC concerning auto-generated > mail, and being DKIM signed too. > > Unfortunately, what this means is that effectively the spammers have > won the arms race: it is becoming increasingly difficult to get email > through to the intended destination due to all the filtering that > people now impose (not that it ever has been guaranteed.) Hi Russell, Our IT department is slow, too slow. :-) As an option, would it be possible for you to "manually" send me a new password? Another option would be to change the mail for my account to ulf.hansson@linaro.org Any help appreciated! Kind regards Ulf Hansson