From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Hesselbarth Subject: Re: [PATCH] MMC: fix sdhci-dove removal Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:16:07 +0100 Message-ID: <508F0027.1010102@gmail.com> References: <20121015094348.GP21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121015103725.GQ21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121015104456.GR21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <87txtdq90y.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> <20121029214307.GH21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <87vcdtosnx.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:61645 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761053Ab2J2WQP (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:16:15 -0400 Received: by mail-bk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id jk13so2203049bkc.19 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:16:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87vcdtosnx.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Ball Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sebastian Hesselbarth On 10/29/2012 10:49 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> Anyway, here's a replacement patch, updated against my cubox tree but >> lacking the cubox gpio changes for it. Un-tested through: (a) I can't >> test this on its own on the cubox, (b) I don't have a separate dove >> tree to test it against and my disk space is all but out at the moment >> for yet another build tree... > > Compile-tested and pushed to mmc-next, and I'll submit it for 3.7 if > I get a Tested-by from someone like Sebastian (CC'd), or for 3.8 if I > don't. (I'll add sdhci-pltfm API rework to my TODO list, too.) Chris, Russell, obviously I am not the one to ask for a Tested-by because it was my patch that originally caused all the trouble. My apologies for this! Anyway, I did test the patch on 3.7-rc3 and except that you need a 3-way git am because of a one-line offset, sdhci-dove runs just fine. Tested-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth