From: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org>
To: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Cc: "Per Förlin" <per.forlin@stericsson.com>,
"cjb@laptop.org" <cjb@laptop.org>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"per.lkml@gmail.com" <per.lkml@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: fix async request mechanism for sequential read scenarios
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:10:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A0E74F.4010604@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50976782.5080808@samsung.com>
On 11/05/2012 09:15 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hello,
> Hi Konstantin,
> On 11/05/2012 03:20 PM, Per Förlin wrote:
>> Hi Konstantin,
>>
>> On 11/01/2012 03:40 PM, Konstantin Dorfman wrote:
>>> When current request is running on the bus and if next request fetched
>>> by mmcqd is NULL, mmc context (mmcqd thread) gets blocked until the
>>> current request completes. This means if new request comes in while
>>> the mmcqd thread is blocked, this new request can not be prepared in
>>> parallel to current ongoing request. This may result in latency to
>>> start new request.
>>>
>>> This change allows to wake up the MMC thread (which
>>> is waiting for the current running request to complete). Now once the
>>> MMC thread is woken up, new request can be fetched and prepared in
>>> parallel to current running request which means this new request can
>>> be started immediately after the current running request completes.
>>>
>>> With this change read throughput is improved by 16%.
>> What HW and what test cases have you been running?
> I also want to know which benchmark use?
> If you can share it, i will test with yours.
>
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
Our tests were done using lmdd and tiotest and iozone:
TIOTEST
-------
tiotest seq: ./data/tiotest -t 1 -d /data/mmc0 -f 800 -b $((512*1024))
-k 1 -k 3
tiotest rand: ./data/tiotest -t 4 -d /data/mmc0 -f 800 -b 4096 -k 2 -k 0
-p -s 2012 -r 12500 -n 20
LMDD
----
lmdd write: ./data/lmdd if=internal of=/data/mmc0/push1 bs=128k
count=2000 sync=1
lmdd read: ./data/lmdd of=internal if=/data/mmc0/push1 bs=128k count=2000
IOZONE
------
iozone (worst): ./data/iozone -i0 -i2 -r4k -s100m -O -o -I -f
/data/mmc0/file3
iozone (best): ./data/iozone -i0 -i2 -r4k -s100m -O -I -f /data/mmc0/file3
Thanks,
--
Konstantin Dorfman,
QUALCOMM ISRAEL, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-12 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <n@samsung.com>
2012-08-05 13:08 ` [RFC/PATCH] mmc: core: Add support for idle time BKOPs Maya Erez
2012-08-30 7:36 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-09-04 5:42 ` merez
2012-10-04 22:28 ` [PATCH v2] mmc: core: Add support for idle time BKOPS Maya Erez
2012-10-09 3:52 ` merez
2012-10-16 7:53 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-11-07 4:28 ` merez
2012-11-08 5:26 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-11-11 9:25 ` Subhash Jadavani
2012-10-18 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] mmc: core: sdio_io.c: Fixed lines with > 80 chars Sangho Yi
2012-10-18 16:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] mmc: core: sdio_bus.c: Removed trailing whitespace error Sangho Yi
2012-10-18 16:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] mmc: core: sdio_bus.c: Fixed lines > 80 chars Sangho Yi
2012-10-18 23:54 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-10-18 16:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] mmc: core: sdio_bus.c: Removed space between func name and () Sangho Yi
2012-10-18 16:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] mmc: core: sdio_bus.c: Fixed a warning for the pr_warning( Sangho Yi
2012-10-18 16:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] mmc: core: sdio_bus.c: Removed unnecessary NULL check routine Sangho Yi
2012-10-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] mmc: core: sdio_io.c: Fixed lines with > 80 chars Joe Perches
2012-11-01 14:40 ` [PATCH v2] mmc: fix async request mechanism for sequential read scenarios Konstantin Dorfman
2012-11-05 6:20 ` Per Förlin
2012-11-05 7:15 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-11-12 12:10 ` Konstantin Dorfman [this message]
2012-11-08 10:41 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-11-08 12:51 ` merez
2012-11-09 5:46 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-11-12 12:49 ` Konstantin Dorfman
2012-11-06 8:40 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-11-12 12:42 ` Konstantin Dorfman
2012-11-12 16:51 ` [PATCH v3] " Konstantin Dorfman
2012-11-13 13:42 ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-11-15 10:23 ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-11-20 2:05 ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-11-25 11:56 ` [PATCH v3] mmc: core: Add support for idle time BKOPS Maya Erez
2012-11-25 12:46 ` merez
2012-11-28 14:22 ` Chris Ball
2012-11-29 12:40 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-12-03 9:49 ` merez
2012-12-04 9:52 ` Ulf Hansson
2012-12-04 21:17 ` merez
2012-12-06 10:18 ` Ulf Hansson
2012-12-12 12:32 ` merez
2012-12-13 10:17 ` Ulf Hansson
2012-12-21 8:35 ` Maya Erez
2012-12-21 9:56 ` Ulf Hansson
2012-12-21 10:24 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-12-05 13:38 ` [PATCH v4] mmc: fix async request mechanism for sequential read scenarios Konstantin Dorfman
2012-12-06 5:24 ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-12-06 14:23 ` Konstantin Dorfman
2012-12-10 14:23 ` [RESEND PATCH " Konstantin Dorfman
2012-12-12 9:26 ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-12-17 12:26 ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-12-18 16:00 ` Konstantin Dorfman
2012-12-18 16:19 ` Chris Ball
2012-12-20 7:39 ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-12-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v5] " Konstantin Dorfman
2012-12-28 10:16 ` Seungwon Jeon
2013-01-14 19:31 ` Chris Ball
2013-01-15 12:00 ` Konstantin Dorfman
2013-01-22 10:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: fix permanent sleep of mmcqd during card removal Seungwon Jeon
2013-01-31 11:05 ` Jaehoon Chung
2013-01-31 11:25 ` Seungwon Jeon
2013-02-08 12:07 ` Konstantin Dorfman
2013-02-11 17:00 ` Chris Ball
2013-01-30 6:30 ` Seungwon Jeon
2013-01-31 6:53 ` Subhash Jadavani
2013-02-04 11:43 ` Subhash Jadavani
2013-02-05 5:57 ` Seungwon Jeon
2013-02-05 7:05 ` Jaehoon Chung
2013-02-05 7:32 ` Subhash Jadavani
2013-02-04 19:27 ` Konstantin Dorfman
2013-01-10 20:15 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for periodic BKOPS Maya Erez
2013-01-11 11:33 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-11-10 17:13 ` [PATCH 0/3] mmc: Support FFU for eMMC v5.0 Avi Shchislowski
2014-11-11 3:33 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-11-10 17:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Avi Shchislowski
2014-11-11 3:07 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-11-11 8:44 ` Avi Shchislowski
2014-11-10 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] " Avi Shchislowski
2014-11-11 3:30 ` Jaehoon Chung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A0E74F.4010604@codeaurora.org \
--to=kdorfman@codeaurora.org \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=per.forlin@stericsson.com \
--cc=per.lkml@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).