From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] at91: fixes for 3.7-rc7 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:25:42 +0100 Message-ID: <50ACBA36.4030101@atmel.com> References: <50AA5ED5.8090901@atmel.com> <50AA6C76.3000606@atmel.com> <50AB466F.5010500@atmel.com> <20121121070303.GD7615@quad.lixom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.242]:57668 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754056Ab2KULZo (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2012 06:25:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121121070303.GD7615@quad.lixom.net> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel list , Ludovic Desroches , Chris Ball , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , linux-arm-kernel , Linus Walleij On 11/21/2012 08:03 AM, Olof Johansson : > Hi, > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:59:27AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> Arnd, Olof, >> >> Just for the record, I do not want to put pressure at a such late time in >> the 3.7-rc process. So, I just reworked that pull-request because the previous >> one was wrong: >> - wrong patch content (DT nodes with wrong size) >> - not all tags in patches (Jean-Christophe and Arnd tags were missing...) >> >> Just to start from a sane base if I have to rebase this work for 3.8, I let you know >> that I have updated this tag... >> >> The following changes since commit 641f3ce64b050961d454a0716bb6dbf528315aac: >> >> ARM: at91/usbh: fix overcurrent gpio setup (2012-11-16 10:46:29 +0100) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-fixes > > The new patches seem to belong in an at91/dt branch, not in a fixes one. > > I can pull in the previous fixes branch as an at91/fixes-non-critical for 3.8 > if you want. There's no need to rebase them for this, is there? What is the > pinctrl dependency that you are talking about, are some of these patches needed > as prerequisites for pinctrl changes or the other way around? > > Sorry if I've missed more elaborate emails on this and are asking repeat > questions. ;) No worries Olof, I might have been more precise in the subject of my email: I have made up my mind and consider this material for 3.8. As for the relation with pinctrl, we have made big modification to the layout of some dtsi/dts there and it would make everyones' life easier if we queue these dt/mmc changes on top of the current pinctrl tree... Moreover, Jean-Christophe plans to add the pinctrl part of these additions on top of the modification present in this pull-request: one more reason to queue them in pinctrl git tree. So, in brief: forget this pull-request (and the one that it replaces obviously). Thanks, bye, -- Nicolas Ferre