* [PATCH] mmc: queue: exclude asynchronous transfer for special request @ 2012-12-20 10:27 Seungwon Jeon 2012-12-20 14:44 ` Konstantin Dorfman 2012-12-20 14:52 ` Konstantin Dorfman 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Seungwon Jeon @ 2012-12-20 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-mmc Cc: 'Chris Ball', 'Per Forlin', 'Konstantin Dorfman' Unlike normal r/w request, special requests(discard, flush) is finished with a one-time issue_fn. Request change to mqrq_prev makes unnecessary call. Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> --- drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c index fadf52e..a71db7a 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d) do { struct request *req = NULL; struct mmc_queue_req *tmp; + unsigned int cmd_flags = 0; spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock); set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); @@ -67,12 +68,19 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d) if (req || mq->mqrq_prev->req) { set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); + cmd_flags = req ? req->cmd_flags : 0; mq->issue_fn(mq, req); /* * Current request becomes previous request * and vice versa. + * In case of special requests, current request + * has been finished. Do not remain it to previous + * request. */ + if (cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD || cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH) + mq->mqrq_cur->req = NULL; + mq->mqrq_prev->brq.mrq.data = NULL; mq->mqrq_prev->req = NULL; tmp = mq->mqrq_prev; -- 1.7.0.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mmc: queue: exclude asynchronous transfer for special request 2012-12-20 10:27 [PATCH] mmc: queue: exclude asynchronous transfer for special request Seungwon Jeon @ 2012-12-20 14:44 ` Konstantin Dorfman 2012-12-20 14:52 ` Konstantin Dorfman 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Konstantin Dorfman @ 2012-12-20 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Seungwon Jeon; +Cc: linux-mmc, 'Chris Ball', 'Per Forlin' Hello, On 12/20/2012 12:27 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > Unlike normal r/w request, special requests(discard, flush) > is finished with a one-time issue_fn. Request change to > mqrq_prev makes unnecessary call. > > Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c > index fadf52e..a71db7a 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d) > do { > struct request *req = NULL; > struct mmc_queue_req *tmp; > + unsigned int cmd_flags = 0; > > spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock); > set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > @@ -67,12 +68,19 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d) > > if (req || mq->mqrq_prev->req) { > set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); > + cmd_flags = req ? req->cmd_flags : 0; > mq->issue_fn(mq, req); > > /* > * Current request becomes previous request > * and vice versa. > + * In case of special requests, current request > + * has been finished. Do not remain it to previous > + * request. > */ > + if (cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD || cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH) > + mq->mqrq_cur->req = NULL; > + It is better to define control mask, REQ_CONTROL_MASK, which will include all control/special requests. Then, when additional requests will be added, there will be no need to change here. Another option - to clean mq->mqrq_cur->req immediately after executing a special request in mmc_blk_issue_rq(). mq->mqrq_prev->brq.mrq.data = NULL; mq->mqrq_prev->req = NULL; tmp = mq->mqrq_prev; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mmc: queue: exclude asynchronous transfer for special request 2012-12-20 10:27 [PATCH] mmc: queue: exclude asynchronous transfer for special request Seungwon Jeon 2012-12-20 14:44 ` Konstantin Dorfman @ 2012-12-20 14:52 ` Konstantin Dorfman 2012-12-21 5:36 ` Seungwon Jeon 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Konstantin Dorfman @ 2012-12-20 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Seungwon Jeon; +Cc: linux-mmc, 'Chris Ball', 'Per Forlin' Hello Jeon, On 12/20/2012 12:27 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > Unlike normal r/w request, special requests(discard, flush) > is finished with a one-time issue_fn. Request change to > mqrq_prev makes unnecessary call. > > Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c > index fadf52e..a71db7a 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d) > do { > struct request *req = NULL; > struct mmc_queue_req *tmp; > + unsigned int cmd_flags = 0; > > spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock); > set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > @@ -67,12 +68,19 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d) > > if (req || mq->mqrq_prev->req) { > set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); > + cmd_flags = req ? req->cmd_flags : 0; > mq->issue_fn(mq, req); > > /* > * Current request becomes previous request > * and vice versa. > + * In case of special requests, current request > + * has been finished. Do not remain it to previous > + * request. > */ > + if (cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD || cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH) > + mq->mqrq_cur->req = NULL; > + > mq->mqrq_prev->brq.mrq.data = NULL; > mq->mqrq_prev->req = NULL; > tmp = mq->mqrq_prev; > It is better to define control mask, REQ_CONTROL_MASK, which will include all control/special requests. Then, when additional request will be added, there will be no need to change here, only update the mask. Another option - to clean mq->mqrq_cur->req immediately after executing a special request in mmc_blk_issue_rq(). -- Konstantin Dorfman, QUALCOMM ISRAEL, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] mmc: queue: exclude asynchronous transfer for special request 2012-12-20 14:52 ` Konstantin Dorfman @ 2012-12-21 5:36 ` Seungwon Jeon 2012-12-22 10:56 ` Konstantin Dorfman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Seungwon Jeon @ 2012-12-21 5:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Konstantin Dorfman' Cc: linux-mmc, 'Chris Ball', 'Per Forlin' On Thursday, December 20, 2012, Konstantin Dorfman wrote: > Hello Jeon, > > > On 12/20/2012 12:27 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > > Unlike normal r/w request, special requests(discard, flush) > > is finished with a one-time issue_fn. Request change to > > mqrq_prev makes unnecessary call. > > > > Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> > > --- > > drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c > > index fadf52e..a71db7a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c > > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d) > > do { > > struct request *req = NULL; > > struct mmc_queue_req *tmp; > > + unsigned int cmd_flags = 0; > > > > spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock); > > set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > > @@ -67,12 +68,19 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d) > > > > if (req || mq->mqrq_prev->req) { > > set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); > > + cmd_flags = req ? req->cmd_flags : 0; > > mq->issue_fn(mq, req); > > > > /* > > * Current request becomes previous request > > * and vice versa. > > + * In case of special requests, current request > > + * has been finished. Do not remain it to previous > > + * request. > > */ > > + if (cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD || cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH) > > + mq->mqrq_cur->req = NULL; > > + > > mq->mqrq_prev->brq.mrq.data = NULL; > > mq->mqrq_prev->req = NULL; > > tmp = mq->mqrq_prev; > > > It is better to define control mask, REQ_CONTROL_MASK, which will > include all control/special requests. Agree, it's better. > > Then, when additional request will be added, there will be no need to > change here, only update the mask. > > Another option - to clean mq->mqrq_cur->req immediately after executing > a special request in mmc_blk_issue_rq(). Yes, I also approached it with the same idea at the beginning. But it seems that 'queue.c' has a role of management of two requests, while 'block.c' just uses these request. It makes sense? Thanks, Seungwon Jeon > > > -- > Konstantin Dorfman, > QUALCOMM ISRAEL, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, > Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, > hosted by The Linux Foundation > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mmc: queue: exclude asynchronous transfer for special request 2012-12-21 5:36 ` Seungwon Jeon @ 2012-12-22 10:56 ` Konstantin Dorfman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Konstantin Dorfman @ 2012-12-22 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Seungwon Jeon; +Cc: linux-mmc, 'Chris Ball', 'Per Forlin' On 12/21/2012 07:36 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > On Thursday, December 20, 2012, Konstantin Dorfman wrote: >> Hello Jeon, >> >> >> On 12/20/2012 12:27 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: >>> Unlike normal r/w request, special requests(discard, flush) >>> is finished with a one-time issue_fn. Request change to >>> mqrq_prev makes unnecessary call. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 8 ++++++++ >>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c >>> index fadf52e..a71db7a 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c >>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c >>> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d) >>> do { >>> struct request *req = NULL; >>> struct mmc_queue_req *tmp; >>> + unsigned int cmd_flags = 0; >>> >>> spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock); >>> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); >>> @@ -67,12 +68,19 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d) >>> >>> if (req || mq->mqrq_prev->req) { >>> set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); >>> + cmd_flags = req ? req->cmd_flags : 0; >>> mq->issue_fn(mq, req); >>> >>> /* >>> * Current request becomes previous request >>> * and vice versa. >>> + * In case of special requests, current request >>> + * has been finished. Do not remain it to previous >>> + * request. >>> */ >>> + if (cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD || cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH) >>> + mq->mqrq_cur->req = NULL; >>> + >>> mq->mqrq_prev->brq.mrq.data = NULL; >>> mq->mqrq_prev->req = NULL; >>> tmp = mq->mqrq_prev; >>> >> It is better to define control mask, REQ_CONTROL_MASK, which will >> include all control/special requests. > Agree, it's better. > >> >> Then, when additional request will be added, there will be no need to >> change here, only update the mask. >> >> Another option - to clean mq->mqrq_cur->req immediately after executing >> a special request in mmc_blk_issue_rq(). > Yes, I also approached it with the same idea at the beginning. > But it seems that 'queue.c' has a role of management of two requests, > while 'block.c' just uses these request. It makes sense? Sure, agree with you. Thanks, -- Konstantin Dorfman, QUALCOMM ISRAEL, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-22 10:56 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-12-20 10:27 [PATCH] mmc: queue: exclude asynchronous transfer for special request Seungwon Jeon 2012-12-20 14:44 ` Konstantin Dorfman 2012-12-20 14:52 ` Konstantin Dorfman 2012-12-21 5:36 ` Seungwon Jeon 2012-12-22 10:56 ` Konstantin Dorfman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).