From: Roger Tseng <rogerable@realtek.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
"cjb@laptop.org" <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: "sameo@linux.intel.com" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Wei_wang <wei_wang@realsil.com.cn>,
"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] MMC: rtsx: remove driving adjustment
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:51:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511073C5.9040300@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130204084737.GG4937@mwanda>
Hi Dan,
Correct. I will prevent this kind of breaking in the future.
However, after our analysis the breaking of patch 1/3 and 2/3 should not
fail old devices. And since Samuel has applied 2/3 and 3/3, it might be
better for Chris to apply patch 1/3 and let all this things appear in
kernel v3.9.
Hi Chris,
Would you please apply patch 1/3 for kernel v3.9. Thanks.
Best regards,
Roger Tseng
On 02/04/2013 04:47 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:45:57PM +0800, Roger Tseng wrote:
>> Several new models of readers use different way to select driving
>> capability(a necessary adjustment along with voltage change). Removing this
>> from device-independent rtsx_pci_sdmmc module. It will be implemented in
>> device-depend calls encapsulated by rtsx_pci_switch_output_voltage().
>>
>
> I'm not sure I understand.
>
> Does this patch break things and then "[PATCH 2/3] mfd: rtsx:
> implement driving adjustment to device-dependent callbacks" fixes
> things again? In other words, will all the old devices run if we
> only apply patch 1/3 and not 2/3?
>
> That's not the right idea. Just merge the two patches into one
> patch.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>
> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-05 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-04 7:45 [PATCH 0/3] rtsx: patchset for supporting new model RTS5227 Roger Tseng
2013-02-04 7:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] MMC: rtsx: remove driving adjustment Roger Tseng
2013-02-04 8:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-02-05 2:51 ` Roger Tseng [this message]
2013-02-05 8:30 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-02-11 17:53 ` Chris Ball
2013-02-04 7:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] mfd: rtsx: implement driving adjustment to device-dependent callbacks Roger Tseng
2013-02-04 11:56 ` Samuel Ortiz
2013-02-04 7:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] mfd: rtsx: support RTS5227 Roger Tseng
2013-02-04 11:57 ` Samuel Ortiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=511073C5.9040300@realtek.com \
--to=rogerable@realtek.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wei_wang@realsil.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).