From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>,
Sergey Yanovich <ynvich@gmail.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: core: fix performance regression initializing MMC host controllers
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 10:26:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515E7CB2.9020602@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFry9CUmguXw0u4Vxa6YXixF-vVzGrvT_MorFjg=1wS+pA@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/04/13 00:02, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 4 April 2013 15:41, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
>> Commit fa5501890d8974301042e0202d342a6cbe8609f4 introduced a performance
>> regression by adding mmc_power_up() to mmc_start_host(). mmc_power_up()
>> is not necessary to host controller initialization, it is part of card
>> initialization and is performed anyway asynchronously.
>
> This commit message is a bit miss-leading. In eMMC case, when the host
> driver has no possibility of power cycle the VCCQ power supply but
> only the VCC, this is the only proper way to prevent violation of the
> eMMC spec.
But that is not true. The host controller driver can manage the voltages.
The patch is a workaround for the regulator_init_complete late initcall.
I deliberately did not paraphrase the original commit so that people who
wanted to know would have to look at it for themselves. I really cannot add
things to my commit message that do not make sense to me.
>
>>From SD-card point of view, it is not needed, so this can be optimized
> to be done as before in an asynchronous mode.
>
>>
>> This patch allows a driver to leave the power up in asynchronous code
>> (as it was before).
>>
>> On my current target platform this reduces driver initialization from:
>>
>> [ 1.313220] initcall sdhci_acpi_driver_init+0x0/0x12 returned 0 after 102008 usecs
>>
>> to this:
>>
>> [ 1.217209] initcall sdhci_acpi_driver_init+0x0/0x12 returned 0 after 8331 usecs
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 2 ++
>> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> index 3bf1c46..c1893c9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> @@ -2416,7 +2416,8 @@ void mmc_start_host(struct mmc_host *host)
>> {
>> host->f_init = max(freqs[0], host->f_min);
>> host->rescan_disable = 0;
>> - mmc_power_up(host);
>> + if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_NO_PRESCAN_POWERUP))
>> + mmc_power_up(host);
>> mmc_detect_change(host, 0);
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>> index 2592ddd..7bcf74b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>> @@ -195,6 +195,8 @@ static int sdhci_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> host->mmc->pm_caps |= c->slot->pm_caps;
>> }
>>
>> + host->mmc->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_NO_PRESCAN_POWERUP;
>> +
>> err = sdhci_add_host(host);
>> if (err)
>> goto err_free;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> index 17d7148..8873e83 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
>> #define MMC_CAP2_PACKED_WR (1 << 13) /* Allow packed write */
>> #define MMC_CAP2_PACKED_CMD (MMC_CAP2_PACKED_RD | \
>> MMC_CAP2_PACKED_WR)
>> +#define MMC_CAP2_NO_PRESCAN_POWERUP (1 << 14) /* Don't power up before scan */
>>
>> mmc_pm_flag_t pm_caps; /* supported pm features */
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.11.7
>>
>
>
> Some update to the commit msg, then I am happy.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-05 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-04 13:41 [PATCH 0/2] sdhci-acpi initialization performance regression Adrian Hunter
2013-04-04 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "mmc: core: wait while adding MMC host to ensure root mounts successfully" Adrian Hunter
2013-04-04 13:52 ` Sergey Yanovich
2013-04-04 13:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: core: fix performance regression initializing MMC host controllers Adrian Hunter
2013-04-04 21:02 ` Ulf Hansson
2013-04-05 7:26 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2013-04-05 7:40 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] mmc: core: fix performance regression initializing MMC, " Adrian Hunter
2013-04-05 9:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: core: fix performance regression initializing MMC " Ulf Hansson
2013-04-05 13:30 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-04-05 13:31 ` [PATCH V3 " Adrian Hunter
2013-04-08 9:41 ` Ulf Hansson
2013-04-08 10:49 ` [PATCH V4 " Adrian Hunter
2013-04-12 18:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] sdhci-acpi initialization performance regression Chris Ball
2013-04-15 6:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-04-15 15:42 ` Chris Ball
2013-04-17 5:55 ` Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515E7CB2.9020602@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=ynvich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox