From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sdhci-acpi initialization performance regression Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:47:30 +0300 Message-ID: <516BA282.2000500@intel.com> References: <1365082866-28404-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <87fvyvfwor.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:19409 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750911Ab3DOGm6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Apr 2013 02:42:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fvyvfwor.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Ball Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson , Linus Walleij , Namjae Jeon , Sergey Yanovich , Jaehoon Chung On 12/04/13 21:09, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On Thu, Apr 04 2013, Adrian Hunter wrote: >> When I submitted the sdhci-acpi driver, it's initialization performance >> was satisfactory. Now it is not. Here are 2 fixes to restore that >> regression. >> >> Adrian Hunter (2): >> Revert "mmc: core: wait while adding MMC host to ensure root mounts successfully" >> mmc: core: fix performance regression initializing MMC host controllers >> >> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 4 ++-- >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 2 ++ >> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Thanks, both pushed to mmc-next (using v4 of patch 2/2) for 3.10. Thanks you! It looks like mmc-next and linux-next have the V1 version of patch 2/2. Can you replace it with V4?