From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dirk Behme Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MMC: FSL SDHC: Add support for hard-wired (permanent) card. Kernel version 3.4.47 Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 08:29:58 +0200 Message-ID: <51B57266.9050107@de.bosch.com> References: <1370155128-680-1-git-send-email-ogabbay@advaoptical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1370155128-680-1-git-send-email-ogabbay@advaoptical.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Oded Gabbay Cc: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "cjb@laptop.org" , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "rob@landley.net" , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On 02.06.2013 08:38, Oded Gabbay wrote: > This patch adds support of recognizing hard-wired (permanent) cards > to Freescale's SDHC host driver. This is done by adding the option > "fsl,card-wired" to the SDHC device-tree entry. Detection of this > option is done in the probe function. Update documentation in file > fsl-esdhc.txt Why don't you want to introduce "fsl,card-wired"? Why don't you use "non-removable"? To my understanding the patch https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7f217794ffa72f208a250b79ab0b7ea3de19677f explicitly removed "fsl,card-wired". So I don't think re-introducing it is a good idea? Best regards Dirk