public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian Daudt" <csd@broadcom.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"arm@kernel.org" <arm@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: change mmc_gpio_get_cd to call non-sleep gpio
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:36:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5212ABE0.8030601@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52040962.6040003@broadcom.com>

On 13-08-08 02:10 PM, Christian Daudt wrote:
> On 13-08-08 02:06 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Christian Daudt wrote:
>>
>>> Given that mmc_gpio_get_cd can be called in softirq
>>> context (by sdhci_tasklet_card -> sdhci_card_event ->
>>> sdhci_do_get_cd -> mmc_gpio_get_cd ), it is necessary
>>> for it to use gpio_get_value instead of
>>> gpio_get_value_cansleep
>>> Note that at present sdhci_card_event gets called both
>>> from mmc_gpio_cd_irqt and sdhci_tasklet_card, and from
>>> both it gets called immediately while the actual cd
>>> processing is debounced to 200ms later. I think that
>>> the better solution might be to move the sdhci_card_event
>>> callback into mmc_rescan and remove it from its 2
>>> present locations. That way the cd related callbacks
>>> are aligned with the actual cd detection code. I can
>>> submit a follow-up patch with these mods if that sounds
>>> like a better way to solve this.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Daudt <csd@broadcom.com>
>> I don't think this is a right approach. It will Oops if the card-detect
>> GPIO is provided by, e.g. an I2C GPIO controller. Instead the driver
>> should be fixed to only call this function from a sleeping context.
> I don't think that card-detect would ever be tied to i2c but I might 
> be wrong on that one... If there's agreement that moving 
> sdhci_card_event into just being called from mmc_rescan is the better 
> way to solve this, then I'll drop this patch and replace it with one 
> that does just that.
>
>  Thanks,
>    csd
>
[adding arm@kernel.org for more input]
Guennadi,
  While I can't see card-detect coming in through i2c gpio controller, I 
think that moving this out of the sleeping context (and into mmc_rescan) 
is probably the better solution anyways. So I'll drop this patch and 
send another one with that change instead.


  Thanks,
    csd



      reply	other threads:[~2013-08-19 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-08 20:47 [PATCH] mmc: change mmc_gpio_get_cd to call non-sleep gpio Christian Daudt
2013-08-08 21:06 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-08-08 21:10   ` Christian Daudt
2013-08-19 23:36     ` Christian Daudt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5212ABE0.8030601@broadcom.com \
    --to=csd@broadcom.com \
    --cc=arm@kernel.org \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox