Re: [RFC V2 1/4] mmc: dw_mmc: exynos: move the exynos private init

[Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>]

Hi Yuvaraj,

On 08/23/2013 08:15 PM, Yuvaraj Kumar C D wrote:
> Currently platform specific private data initialisation is done by
> dw_mci_exynos_priv_init and dw_mci_exynos_parse_dt.As we already have
> separate platform specific device tree parser dw_mci_exynos_parse_dt,
> move the dw_mci_exynos_priv_init code to dw_mci_exynos_parse_dt.
> We can use the dw_mci_exynos_priv_init to do some actual platform
> specific initialisation of SMU and etc.
> 
> changes since V1: none
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c |   31 +++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> index 9990f98..19c845b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> @@ -72,22 +72,8 @@ static struct dw_mci_exynos_compatible {
>  
>  static int dw_mci_exynos_priv_init(struct dw_mci *host)
>  {
> -	struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv;
> -	int idx;
> -
> -	priv = devm_kzalloc(host->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!priv) {
> -		dev_err(host->dev, "mem alloc failed for private data\n");
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
> -
> -	for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_compat); idx++) {
> -		if (of_device_is_compatible(host->dev->of_node,
> -					exynos_compat[idx].compatible))
> -			priv->ctrl_type = exynos_compat[idx].ctrl_type;
> -	}
> +	struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
>  
> -	host->priv = priv;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -177,12 +163,24 @@ static void dw_mci_exynos_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>  
>  static int dw_mci_exynos_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
>  {
> -	struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
> +	struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv;
>  	struct device_node *np = host->dev->of_node;
>  	u32 timing[2];
>  	u32 div = 0;
> +	int idx;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	priv = devm_kzalloc(host->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!priv) {
> +		dev_err(host->dev, "mem alloc failed for private data\n");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_compat); idx++) {
> +		if (of_device_is_compatible(np, exynos_compat[idx].compatible))
> +			priv->ctrl_type = exynos_compat[idx].ctrl_type;
> +	}
> +
>  	of_property_read_u32(np, "samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div", &div);
>  	priv->ciu_div = div;
>  
> @@ -199,6 +197,7 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	priv->ddr_timing = SDMMC_CLKSEL_TIMING(timing[0], timing[1], div);
> +	host->priv = priv;

I'm not sure whether my thinking is right or not.
if host->pdata is present, then dw_mci_parse_dt() didn't called at dw_mci_probe.
then how host->priv set to priv?

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>