From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sdhci: do not program timer when tuning_count is zero
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 19:49:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527CCFB1.5020906@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <527CAA9F.5030907@broadcom.com>
On 11/08/2013 05:10 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 11/08/2013 07:50 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
>> On 11/07/2013 06:59 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> When the host->tuning_count is zero it means that the
>>
>> If the tuning_count is zero, then the retuning timer shouldn't be
>> started in the first place and not possible to run code there. Or is the
>> tuning_count dynamically changed?
>
> Actually, the sdhci_execute_tuning() must run once to do the initial
> tuning procedure. This is mandatory for SDR104. However, *re*tuning is
> not and a zero tuning_count disables it.
So the host in question doesn't need do retuning while in SDR104 mode?
It seems your host's retuning mode is mode_1.
>
> The function is executed initially. The 'if' statement above the patched
> 'else' statement is actually responsible for programming the retuning
> timer for the first time. However, it requires tuning_count to be
> non-zero. The 'else' statement is actually for reloading the retuning
> timer, which is not the case. Adding the non-zero check assures the
> retuning timer is never started.
OK, I see.
The SDHCI_USING_RETUNING_TIMER flag is supposed to mean if the host is
currently using retuning timer to do retuning, it could also be used to
decide if retuning timer needs be re-programmed.
Anyway, a host in retuning mode 1 does not have tuning_count set seems a
little odd to me...
Thanks,
Aaron
>
> I guess the fact that this needs explaining indicates that the commit
> message should be updated. I will send a V2 for this.
>
> Regards,
> Arend
>
>> Thanks,
>> Aaron
>>
>>> retuning is disabled. Doing a mod_timer() with a zero
>>> tuning_count does something else.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>>> index 7a7fb4f..9803e7a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>>> @@ -2007,7 +2007,8 @@ out:
>>> } else {
>>> host->flags &= ~SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING;
>>> /* Reload the new initial value for timer */
>>> - if (host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1)
>>> + if (host->tuning_count &&
>>> + host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1)
>>> mod_timer(&host->tuning_timer, jiffies +
>>> host->tuning_count * HZ);
>>> }
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-08 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-07 10:59 [PATCH] sdhci: do not program timer when tuning_count is zero Arend van Spriel
2013-11-08 6:50 ` Aaron Lu
2013-11-08 9:10 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-11-08 11:49 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2013-11-08 11:55 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-11-08 13:19 ` Aaron Lu
2013-11-11 9:49 ` [PATCH V2] sdhci: only reprogram retuning timer when flag is set Arend van Spriel
2013-11-12 6:49 ` Aaron Lu
2013-11-13 5:02 ` Dong Aisheng
2013-11-13 10:21 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-11-13 11:12 ` Dong Aisheng
2013-11-13 11:18 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-11-13 11:25 ` Dong Aisheng
2013-11-13 13:01 ` Aaron Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527CCFB1.5020906@intel.com \
--to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).